Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 3441 - 3460
of 4,765
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2012, 6:36 pm
The FDCPA generously protects consumers using the "least sophisticated consumer standard" to guarantee the protection of the "gullible as well as the shrewd. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 3:11 am
” See West River Bridge v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 9:51 pm
By holding, the Supreme Court was reaffirming its holding in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 11:29 am
There isn’t as much law because Buckman Co. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 5:09 am
M & T Bank Corp. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 2:52 pm
Can it be argued that coding up your bot to offer very specific deal terms when a consumer clicks on something constitutes an indication of actual knowledge and intention similar to a price list? [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 1:56 pm
Supermarkets, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 7:52 am
Protecting the sensibilities of women and children who shouldn't see the bawdy display? [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 7:37 am
Personal Keepsakes, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 5:20 am
This is what he said: “Now, I nominated Richard [Cordray] for [the position of Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ("CFPB")] last summer . . . [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 3:17 pm
Look at historical record where people didn’t put proper notice on works and thus weren’t protected—70%, roughly. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 10:36 pm
(Romer v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 7:47 pm
They end up in workhouses, orphanages, coopted by criminal gangs. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 8:39 am
” Id. at *6 n.2.This last proposition is of particular interest, as many other (but not all) consumer protection statutes contain a similar “consumer” limitation. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 3:35 pm
Onetime adversaries in Bush v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 9:58 am
Mazza v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 3:30 am
The Oklahoma Supreme Court released Harris v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 3:00 am
(pictured), in Auriga Capital Corp. v. [read post]
