Search for: "The People v. Cross"
Results 3441 - 3460
of 6,171
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2014, 5:00 am
” Jacobellis v. [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 10:54 am
Brattleboro S&L Assoc. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:11 am
A court should not employ a presumption where to do so would “elevate a legal construct above common sense” (People v Giordano, 87 NY2d 441 [1995]). [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 11:39 pm
Henley Regatta v. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 10:53 am
Case citation: Demetriades v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 6:18 am
That Cross is now the subject of a constitutional challenge by a national atheist group.The case is American Atheists, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 10:50 am
Yesterday, in U.S. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 10:23 pm
After Apple very recently dropped its cross-appeal in the first Samsung case, the case is just about money. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 3:17 pm
There is some short term interest, but people move on. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 11:54 am
’” FDA v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 2:33 pm
People v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 12:24 pm
You know you've crossed a line when you start making up clients to help. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 4:15 am
In American Atheists, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 7:31 am
He did so in a very proportional way, Jeremy thinks.* When the Writ Hits the PhanRebecca writes about a professional YouTuber, Ms Phan, using other people’s songs in her videos and being sued by a label owning copyright on those works. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 4:30 am
But there were plainly still new frontiers to be crossed, most particularly I think in respect of inferential statements. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 1:04 am
Cross-motions for summary judgment in Palmer were filed on in October 2009, and a hearing held in Jan. 2010. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 7:22 pm
Pursuant to Code Crim.Proc., § 280 and as held in People v Jackson, People v Krank, except where time is a material ingredient of the crime the prosecution is not confined in its evidence to the precise date laid in the indictment, but may prove that the offense was committed at any time prior to the commencement of the prosecution and such proof does not constitute a material variance. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 4:16 pm
People v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am
’” In other words, peer review is a shabby substitute for cross-examination and an adversarial process.[16] That adversarial process cannot always unfold fully and fairly in front of a jury. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 8:49 am
Related Issues: NSA SpyingRelated Cases: Jewel v. [read post]
