Search for: "UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE" Results 3441 - 3460 of 6,104
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2024, 11:08 am by Julia E. Browning and Stephen Marietta
Patent & Trademark Office did not violate the First Amendment when it refused to register the trademark “Trump Too Small. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 11:43 am by John Elwood
The United States Patent & Trademark Office refused registration under Section 2(c), and the Trademark and Trial Appeal Board upheld that decision because the mark identified the by-then-former president without his consent. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 1:47 pm by Holly
Panjshiri  [1/30/23] My previous blog post, “What are the Types of Trademarks,” explained the distinction between Trademarks, Service Marks, State Marks, Federal Marks, and Common Law Marks, which are common types of protection for marks in the United States. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 10:00 pm
Patent Office, the patents are presumed valid and can be asserted. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 2:48 pm by mmorgan
Crowdsourcing Prior Art The United Stated Patent and Trademark office is exploring options to encourage the disclosure and sharing of prior art, in particular, difficult to find references, in an effort to increase the quality of patents and strengthen the patent process. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 8:00 am by Nathan Mannebach (US)
Recently, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) asked the Federal Circuit to reissue its opinion as precedential to “provide guidance and certainty to future applicants regarding the statutory basis for the failure-to-function refusal and its parameters, as well as the evidence relevant to that analysis” and to “reduce the probability of subsequent litigation over the same question. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 8:00 am by Nathan Mannebach (US)
Recently, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) asked the Federal Circuit to reissue its opinion as precedential to “provide guidance and certainty to future applicants regarding the statutory basis for the failure-to-function refusal and its parameters, as well as the evidence relevant to that analysis” and to “reduce the probability of subsequent litigation over the same question. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 11:07 am by Gene Quinn
Interestingly, only two government entities are exempt from the requirement that proceeds be turned over to the Treasury — the United States Postal Service or the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 5:49 am by Rachel Sandler
Unger THE COLLABORATIVE SEARCH PILOT PROGRAM  [1] In an attempt to expedite and promote the quality of patent application examination, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) began a Collaborative Search Pilot (CSP) program in partnership with the Japan Patent Office (JPO) and the Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO). [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 8:01 am by Danica Mathes
Patent and Trademark Office), you may want to have a more comprehensive search performed to review all federal and state trademark records, common law sources, domain name registrations, web results, and business names to be as certain as possible that your mark is available for your use and registration throughout the United States. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:32 am by Ronald Mann
The case came to the Court presenting a hot topic from contemporary legal scholarship: why should courts give deference to the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO), requiring “clear and convincing evidence” to overturn a patent based on prior art that the PTO never considered? [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 5:52 am
The Boeing Company ("Boeing") filed a motion to stay pending inter partes review" ("IPR") after Boeing had requested that the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("PTO") conduct an inter partes review of U.S. [read post]
21 Sep 2019, 6:10 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The district court,affirming the United States Patent and Trademark Office(“PTO”), held that this additional period of examination is not subject to any term adjustment,1 and my colleaguesagree. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 5:59 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Although not a monumental legal case, the CAFC decision in IN RE ROBERT YEAGER merits a look by patent attorneys, both because of the subject matter [methods of identifying relevant prior art references within a database for disclosure to the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with a patent application] and because of the arguments made [for example, because a patent applicant’s duty of disclosure is a… [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 1:00 am
Today, David Lammy, UK Minister of State for Higher Education and Intellectual Property and well-known blogger David Kappos, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), committed both the IPO and the USPTO to develop a plan to optimise reuse of work on patent applications that are filed jointly at the USPTO and the IPO. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 9:52 am by Sarah M.D. Luth
Filings in China in 2018 surpassed those of the other members of the so-called TM5 (the five largest trademark offices in the world: China, the United States, South Korea, Japan, and Europe). [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 7:29 am
Although the analysis focuses on the history of patent law in the United States, it develops themes that illuminate the evolution of patent regimes in Europe [In this regard, the US is the sun to Europe's moon. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 4:42 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Hovenkamp ("[P]otential [patent] defendants can do better by forming a litigation cost-sharing agreement: a contractual agreement that divides a member's defense costs among the group when the plaintiff is a PAE, and which requires members to litigate predatory claims to judgment.")The Failed Promise of User Fees: Empirical Evidence from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, by Michael Frakes & Melissa F. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 12:11 pm by LTA-Editor
Following the roll-out of the American Invents Act, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) started to solicit public comments for a proposed rule change package for trials before the PTAB and has proposed a pilot program to have a single Administrative Patent Judge determine the institution of an Inter Partes Review. [read post]