Search for: "UNITED STATES v. FLORIDA" Results 3441 - 3460 of 6,508
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
[a] regulatory body ... of ... the United States"—in this case, the FDA. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 9:30 am by Karen Tani
Part IX highlights how past is prologue for Florida film and television, why current state and federal initiatives will prevent major production efforts from becoming runaway boons to other states and countries, and the demonstrable economic benefits those laws and policies have already produced for Florida in particular, and the United States in general. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 6:30 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Traveller, and Advanced Cell Technology, Inc.Case number: 12-cv-01210 (United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida)Case filed: May 30, 2012Qualifying Judgment/Order: December 30, 2013 02/24/2014 05/25/2014 2014-16 SEC v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 4:39 am by Amy Howe
” At Constitutional Law Prof Blog, Ruthann Robson notes that judges in several lower courts have relied on Justice Scalia’s dissent in United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 4:28 am by Amy Howe
At more than twenty cents, Andrew Suszek criticizes what he describes as the “strong trend among journalists and judges alike in using the” Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 3:50 pm by Jacek Stramski
Westphal points to several factors to show that the provision is inadequate and unfair: 1) Florida’s original Worker’s Compensation Law included a 350 week limit for temporary disability; 2) Florida’s 104 week limit is tied for least employee-friendly in the United States; 3) Florida no longer mandates full medical benefits, which could offset the harsh limit on temporary benefits; and 4) Florida has repealed the… [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 6:21 am by Amy Howe
 In United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 9:53 am
The Florida bill also listed required various performance measures for work release centers. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:26 am by Amy Howe
District Judge Vaughn Walker striking down California’s ban on same-sex marriage, noting that although the Supreme Court later “chose to speak on gay marriage through a narrower case, ruling only that the federal government must recognize marriages solemnized under state law,” since then the lower courts “have been reading the [United States v.] [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 5:00 am by Trevor Cutaiar
  The United States Supreme Court has eased this tension in some cases by crafting the single claimant exception. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 3:33 am
Injunctive relief generally is not available to prohibit the making of defamatory statements as prior restraints on speech violate the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 4:37 am by Amy Howe
At Talking Points Memo, Sahil Kapur examines the extent to which the lower courts have relied on last year’s decision in United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:10 am by Eric P. Robinson
(Private figure plaintiffs must still demonstrate fault on the part of the defendant in order to win a defamation case, but the specific level of fault that a private figure plaintiff must show varies from state to state.) [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:10 am by Eric P. Robinson
(Private figure plaintiffs must still demonstrate fault on the part of the defendant in order to win a defamation case, but the specific level of fault that a private figure plaintiff must show varies from state to state.) [read post]