Search for: "United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit"
Results 3441 - 3460
of 7,493
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm
As a point of context, it’s worth noting that many states already require disclosure or much more draconian regulation of litigation funders backing state court cases—for instance, some states require funds and funders to register, and some even require funding agreements to be disclosed with the state. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 5:24 am
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 11:45 am
This post examines a recent opinion from the Supreme Courtof Appeals of West Virginia: State v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 11:34 am
” The Court stated that — contrary to the Fifth and Tenth Circuits — it had “explicitly held “in United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 9:07 am
God save the United States and this Honorable Court! [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 5:47 am
Third, the States are indeed engaged on these issues, as the recent proliferation of legislative activity across the country shows. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 8:22 am
Approximately three months ago the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied Google's Motorola Mobility a rehearing and subsequently remanded to the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC) the investigation of Apple's complaint against Motorola with respect to two patents-in-suit.U.S. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:43 pm
Subsequently, on June 30, 2016, in a 2-1 decision, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed Judge Feldman’s ruling, upholding the FWS’s designation of Unit 1 as a “critical habitat” under the ESA. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:43 pm
Subsequently, on June 30, 2016, in a 2-1 decision, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed Judge Feldman’s ruling, upholding the FWS’s designation of Unit 1 as a “critical habitat” under the ESA. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:43 pm
Subsequently, on June 30, 2016, in a 2-1 decision, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed Judge Feldman’s ruling, upholding the FWS’s designation of Unit 1 as a “critical habitat” under the ESA. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:13 am
After nearly four months of consideration[1], the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a decision in the controversial AMP v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:13 am
After nearly four months of consideration[1], the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a decision in the controversial AMP v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 8:09 am
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals held in Spong that the attorney was entitled to file a dischargeability complaint as a third party beneficiary of the agreement. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 10:59 am
How far does the first sale or "exhaustion" principle extend in the United States? [read post]
24 May 2012, 1:02 pm
The United States Supreme Court has granted the plaintiffs’ petition to review the Ninth Circuit ruling, and is poised to resolve the conflict regarding the Outside Sales exemption. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 12:23 pm
Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit reversed and remanded to the district court. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 1:56 am
There could be a new damages trial (relating to 14 of the 28 accused products) in a matter of months; if it does take place, it could even be (as Samsung requests) a full retrial on those products involving a new decision on the merits (whether the asserted intellectual property rights are valid and were infringed); and alternatively, the court might enter a partial final judgment with respect to the other 14 products, let Samsung appeal it to the Federal Circuit and stay… [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 9:06 am
Lisa Branch, United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 12:30 pm
Federal law makes it a crime for an alien who has been deported to be present in the United States. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 8:40 am
The supreme court reached its conclusion that the exemplary damages award in Bennett violated federal due process constraints by analyzing it within the framework that the United States Supreme Court established in BMW of North America, Inc. v. [read post]
