Search for: "United States v. David"
Results 3441 - 3460
of 6,867
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2014, 8:18 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 12:38 pm
See David Kaye & David Freedman, “Reference Guide on Statistics,” in F.J.C. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 7:56 am
Magistrate Judge David G. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 11:20 am
” United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 8:30 am
During his time as a teacher he has also argued a number of major cases in state and federal courts, most notably Daubert v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
Regrettably, the scam phenomenon is not exclusive to trade marks and designs, explains David in this post, after receiving a message from the mysterious “European Patent Organization”.* Hurray for judicial sense on product by process claims- Birss triumphs in Hospira v GenentechThis note from Darren is about Hospira v Genentech [on which see the IPKat note here], a pharma-patent case that Mr Justice Birss has decided in light of product-by-process claims. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
… “It’s not such a terrible thing to go on the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 4:53 am
In The New England Journal of Medicine, Nicholas Bagley, David Jones, and Timothy Jost discuss the possible impact of a decision in favor of the challengers in King v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 5:31 am
That’s why EFF filed a “friend of the court” brief in United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 3:10 am
Henley’s name in a transformative nature invoking the protection of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution” and that “the advertisement is obviously a joke. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
United States, a case that asks what a “true threat” is. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 10:08 am
Under the Constitutions of the United States and California, the Powells filed an action for just compensation from the County. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 3:41 am
Texas Division, Son of Confederate Veterans, involving a state’s power to create a specialty license plate program which controls the messages that may be displayed; Brumfield v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 7:16 am
Testifying on behalf of the Judicial Conference of the United States, which makes policy for the federal courts (but does not speak for the Supreme Court), U.S. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 11:01 am
The Times of Israel analyzes why this coalition, notable for being one of the few to exclude the two Haredi parties, Shas and United Torah Judaism, disintegrated so quickly. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 3:14 am
United States, in which the Court is considering whether a Pennsylvania man can be held criminally liable for threatening statements he made on Facebook, dominated Court-related coverage and commentary. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 8:25 am
Arin Intermediate Unit 28 (W.D. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 8:19 am
The Supreme Court held that the courts of the United Kingdom do have jurisdiction to judicially review an Order in Council which is made on the advice of the Government of the United Kingdom acting in whole or in part in the interests of the United Kingdom. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
[xiii] An excellent discussion of the legislative history and Congressional intent of this statute is discussed in United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
Hydranautics v. [read post]
