Search for: "B. Smith"
Results 3461 - 3480
of 5,331
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2011, 12:14 pm
Here is the decision in Smith v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:18 pm
Abu-Jamal Docket No. 11-49 Issue: Whether the court of appeals properly applied Smith v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 1:51 pm
Smith & Wollensky Restaurant Group, Inc. involved a group of waiters working at a restaurant in Manhattan. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 12:49 pm
However, the 1-year grace period exceptions in 35 U.S.C. 102(b) seems to create a quasi or pseudo First-to-File system. 102(b) (1) reads: DISCLOSURES MADE 1 YEAR OR LESS BEFORE THE EFFECTIVE FILING DATE OF THE CLAIMED INVENTION. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 9:01 am
In December 2009, FINRA permanently barred Hammonds from any association with any FINRA member in any capacity for violations of Section 10(b) and 10(b)(5) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and National Association of Securities Dealers Rules 2110, 2120 and 2330. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:39 am
Landis & Loria B. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 12:32 pm
Writing in 1983, Don B. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 8:15 am
B. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 2:00 pm
Class B misdemeanors are crimes which carry up to three months of jail time. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 10:44 am
Calabrese and Robyn B. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 12:18 pm
§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A)(iii), and (2) possession with intent to distribute 5 grams or more of cocaine base, in violation of § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B)(iii). [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 8:52 am
§ 41 (a), (b), and (d) (1) 15% surcharge does not apply to international stage PCT fees, certain petition fees, and enrollment fees Fee table at http://www.uspto.gov/about/offices/cfo/finance/fees.jsp Notice of Availibility of Patent Fee Changes Under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, 76 Fed. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 8:52 am
§ 41 (a), (b), and (d) (1) 15% surcharge does not apply to international stage PCT fees, certain petition fees, and enrollment fees Fee table at http://www.uspto.gov/about/offices/cfo/finance/fees.jsp Notice of Availibility of Patent Fee Changes Under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, 76 Fed. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 8:10 am
Smith & Wollensky Restaurant Group, the Court upheld class certification of wage claims under Rule 23(b)(3) without finding the need to even mention Dukes. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 12:30 pm
His employer at the time was Salomon Smith Barney. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 7:18 am
Smith During World War II, B-17 bombers were known as Flying Fortresses because they could take an incredible pounding and still make it home. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 4:29 am
HemCon, Inc (Patents Post-Grant) (Patently-O) (Reexamination Alert) (IPBiz) CAFC: Construing claim constructions: Cordis Corporation v Boston Scientific (Patently-O) (IPBiz) Kimberly-Clark: CAFC loses an opportunity to address law of preliminary injunctions: Kimberly Clark v First Quality Baby Products (IPBiz) The Federal Circuit’s rare opportunity to protect the public from agency misconduct: In re Jeff Lovin (Patently-O) District Court C D California: Another false marking case dismissed sua… [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 10:54 am
Section 7(b). [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 3:39 pm
Local Rule 54(b)(2) requires that if there is a contested bill of costs containing areas of legitimate disputes, the “party seeking costs must file a bill of costs indicating areas of agreement and disagreement. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 6:03 am
Smith No duh! [read post]
