Search for: "Cost v. Cost"
Results 3461 - 3480
of 48,955
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2023, 4:42 pm
The FTSA allows recovery of $500-1500, per violation, as well as attorneys’ fees and costs. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 9:53 am
, Lucas v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 8:36 am
The City of Carmel v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 8:25 am
The short seller would later reveal that it believed CleanSpark had lowballed ATL’s mining costs. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 8:22 am
Similarly, another example that the FTC provides of a “de facto non-compete clause” is “[a] contractual term between an employer and a worker that requires the worker to pay the employer or a third-party entity for training costs if the worker’s employment terminates within a specified time period, where the required payment is not reasonably related to the costs the employer incurred for training the worker. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 6:12 am
” “Acknowledgement of Conflict Insufficient to Support Claim for Disgorgement of Fees” — “In a Decision and Order, dated December 8, 2022, in Marcum LLP v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 6:00 am
Appellee asserted that the 2019 budget violated the Association Declaration and Bylaws by requiring “garden-style” unit owners to contribute to the cost of maintaining outdoor spaces around the townhouse-style units. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
Phelps (2011) Matal v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:19 am
On 20 December 2022, Chamberlain J heard costs applications in Wright v McCormack. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 3:35 am
The November argument was in United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 10:00 pm
# # #SOURCEBrownell v Starbucks Coffee Company (Class Action Complaint) [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 10:00 pm
LLC v. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 10:59 am
Secondly, via Williams v London Borough of Southwark (2000) All ER (D) 377, a commission could be retained where it was a payment for work done. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
” It might well have been “necessary and proper” to engage in the armed resistance that ultimately cost 750,000 lives in order to prevent the continued maintenance of slavery in the secessionist states. [read post]
7 Jan 2023, 7:48 am
Their basic concern is that they want to escape from Judge Albright’s courtroom and raise costs on the patentee. [read post]
7 Jan 2023, 7:37 am
” * Jones v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 4:22 pm
Ashlesh Biradar v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 9:41 am
[The following was prepared as a Gibson Dunn client alert by Rachel Brass, Svetlana Gans, Kristen Limarzi, Ilissa Samplin, Katherine V. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 8:27 am
In San Diego Building Trades v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 6:02 am
James v. [read post]
