Search for: "Doe Defendants I through V" Results 3461 - 3480 of 12,262
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2011, 6:38 pm by Patrick
It won’t surprise long-time readers to learn that I approve of Justice Scalia’s majority opinion in Brown v. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 4:46 pm
” In August 2016, Boor sent an email to Wildhawk that began with, “As per our handshake agreement, Gerald and I would like to let you know of, and offer your group first right of refusal on the below products. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 8:57 am
Do we imagine Hollywood violence (which way does that cut for the defendant here)? [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 4:57 am
In summary, the General Court held that where an EUTM does not have inherent distinctive character, the distinctive character acquired through use of that mark must be shown throughout the territory of the EU (i.e. in all of the Member States covered by the EUTM). [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 6:05 am by Allan Blutstein
(As an aside, I think these cases are a lesson for the imprudence of Congress trying to prohibit disclosure indirectly through appropriations legislation.) [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Before I answer that question, I'll venture a guess about how such divergences likely will be handled: through tendentious law-office history. [read post]