Search for: "Does 1 - 29" Results 3461 - 3480 of 13,847
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2020, 11:01 am
 At 1:29:57 the moderator, having pulled himself off the floor and collected his thoughts returns to the phrase that doesn't pay. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 10:26 am by Lonnie Roach
Though there is no age requirement, Medicaid does have income and asset limits. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 1:53 am by Diane Tweedlie
Figure 3 and page 7, line 2, to page 8, line 10, explained the steps for calculating reference weather data, and Figure 4 and page 8, lines 11 to 29, explained the steps for the establishing forecast weather data. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 10:51 pm by Jamie Markham
” Slip op. at 29. (2) The Court next considered whether retroactive application of the 2012 RJA amendments to the defendant also violated the prohibition against ex post facto laws. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 1:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
It does so by presenting arguments for a principled tax design of recreational marijuana and by discussing the different strategies and lessons from states with established marijuana markets. [read post]
In his June 1 remarks responding to the widespread protests and sporadic violence that have spread across the country following the murder of George Floyd, President Trump singled out Washington, D.C., for special treatment. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:13 am by Schachtman
”  There is substantial authority to the effect that “bribery” is a generic designation and does not limit predicate acts to state laws that are specifically labeled as bribery. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 6:15 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
 Other Eleonora Rosati shared the news that the Fashion Law London will be held this year online, from 29 June to 1 July, Eleonora, together with Rosie Burbidge and Giulia Gasparin, will discuss intellectual property issues that are most relevant for the practitioners in the field of fashion. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 2:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
Supp. 2d 690, 704 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) ("Section 230(c)(1) does not provide immunity for either federal or state intellectual property claims. [read post]