Search for: "FAIR v. THE STATE"
Results 3461 - 3480
of 30,472
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2009, 9:55 pm
The ABA's Litigation News is reporting on a Seventh Circuit decision that speaks to the seemingly conflicting removal provisions of the Class Action Fairness Act and the Securities Act:The Seventh Circuit's recent decision in Katz v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 6:26 am
Under United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 8:41 pm
Goldstein Takiedine v. 7-Eleven, Inc., No. 17-4518, 2020 U.S. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 8:00 am
”The Appellate Division then ruled that “Under the circumstances presented here, the penalty of dismissal from the petitioner's employment with the school district was not so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness, thus constituting an abuse of discretion,” explaining "An administrative penalty must be upheld unless it is so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness, thus… [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 5:14 am
Hart v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 8:30 pm
On June 21, 2010, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Holder v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 1:27 pm
Earlier this year there was hope in the food and drug industries that the Supreme Court would revisit and possibly revise the Responsible Corporate Officer Doctrine, also known as the Park Doctrine, by granting certiorari to the Eighth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 1:27 pm
Earlier this year there was hope in the food and drug industries that the Supreme Court would revisit and possibly revise the Responsible Corporate Officer Doctrine, also known as the Park Doctrine, by granting certiorari to the Eighth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 2:49 am
The behaviour of the tax authority is compared to that of a diligent and fair administration in order to assess whether the aid was granted, thus forcing Member States to adopt anti-elusive tools and carry out careful ex ante evaluations of the tax rulings proposed by multinationals. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 12:55 pm
Federal district court Judge Chen’s recent dismissal of the third amended complaint in Levitt v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 10:24 am
After all, “interstate commerce may be required to pay its fair share of state taxes. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 5:59 am
AC32975 - State v. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 6:02 am
In Barr v. [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 2:02 pm
On July 26, 2024, the National Labor Relations Board (“Board”) issued its Fair Choice – Employee Voice Final Rule (“Final Rule”), which rescinds a trio of April 2020 amendments to the Board’s Rules and Regulations[1] affecting the Board’s processing of petitions that ultimately make it easier for unions to maintain recognition and stifles employee choice in whether to be represented by a union. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 9:05 am
University of North Carolina and Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 7:32 am
In 1991, the Supreme Court said in Wyatt v. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 10:00 pm
Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Complaint)La Rosa et al. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 1:11 pm
State v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 7:48 am
In Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
12 Jul 2008, 12:59 pm
This week a panel of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals handed down an important decision for consumers in Alaska and other western states. [read post]
