Search for: "Good v. State of California" Results 3461 - 3480 of 7,489
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2008, 9:54 am
Because the California state-law claims were so intermingled with the Lanham Act claims, the fee award could cover them, too. [read post]
19 May 2014, 2:56 pm
California, for if there it had adopted a robust conception of forfeiture doctrine it almos tcertainly would have avoided the very unfortunate reuslt in Michigan v. [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 11:30 pm
So far so good, but does that mean that federal courts must simply accept a state court's answer to the question of who represents the state? [read post]
13 Jan 2025, 3:41 pm by Evan George
Now that the justices have rebuffed the oil industry’s appeal, there’s a good chance that states like Hawaii and California will get to ask the courts to force Big Oil to do just that. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:50 am by Florian Mueller
That will be a problem for Apple in the second California case as well.Ater the Federal Circuit ruling, Samsung had stated publicly that "[t]he remand concerns a very narrow scope of evidence presented by Apple". [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 12:56 pm by Bexis
Under "New Jersey," we noted that the state’s supreme court had specifically approved the practice in Stempler v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 2:24 pm by Cleve Clinton
Thus, EWW would normally have had a good chance of being hauled into California based on its gate leases at LAX. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 2:17 pm by streetartandlaw
“Hayuk’s work has been featured widely in popular online and print publications, such as The New York Times (United States), Huffington Post (United States), Juxtapoz Art & Culture Magazine (United States), Hypebeast (Hong Kong), Arrestedmotion (United States), Laughing Squid (United States), Web Urbanist (United States), NYLON Magazine (United States), Graffiti Art Magazine (France), and StreetArtNews (United… [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
For example, if you operate a business in California, you’re in a constant state of pearl-clutching. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
For example, if you operate a business in California, you’re in a constant state of pearl-clutching. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 5:18 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
Similarly, Hacon HHJ stated in Teva v Novartis [2022] EWHC 2847 (Pat): “It seems that there was little or no interaction between Novartis’ three experts during the preparation of their evidence. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 10:24 pm by Florian Mueller
Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, famous for (among other high-profile cases) FTC v. [read post]