Search for: "J True"
Results 3461 - 3480
of 7,749
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2024, 10:13 pm
The TRUE project seeks to explore the impact of deepfakes on trust in user-generated evidence in accountability processes for human rights violations. [read post]
4 May 2016, 11:51 am
London: Printed for J. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 10:24 am
"Hearn, J.: "Based on our doctrine of deference to ecclesiastical authority, the Appellants represent the true Lower Diocese of the Protestant Episcopal Church in South Carolina and are therefore entitled to all property, including Camp Saint Christopher and the emblems, seals, and trademarks associated with the National Church. [read post]
14 May 2019, 8:01 am
The issue was whether PHM knew or had reason to believe that this was the case, specifically whether this was true of Mr Beatty, owner of LTEV, a shareholder in PHM and Managing Director of both companies.See no evil, here no evil, liable for no evilFBT referred the Court to Columbia Pictures Industries Inc v Robinson [1987] 1 Ch 38 where Scott J said that a person who deliberately refrains from inquiry and shuts their eyes to that which is obvious, cannot be heard to say that they… [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 10:30 am
But—at least prior to Trump, and talking only about the post-J. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 3:33 am
Trump’s longtime friend and ally Roger J. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 5:09 pm
In Tataryn, McLachlin J. made passing mention of Bellas an example of a case where a testator’s moral duty was seen to be negated. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 4:44 am
The point is: is this true? [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 9:42 pm
It is no doubt true that the claim is “concerned primarily” with the information, but that alone does not make it a claim to information as such, rather than a claim to a molecule embodying that information. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 7:28 am
| Beware of your old expert reports, as Henry Carr J allows hearsay expert evidence in Illumina v Ariosa | Still want to be a UPC judge? [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 5:32 am
Joining him will be David J. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 11:36 am
(Hull, J., joining Judge Wellford’s opinion on this question). [read post]
11 May 2021, 10:32 am
Alison J. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 11:15 am
He appeared to approach the issue with a focus on policy considerations: specifically, should a party that has been given assurances and a warranty as to a certain position nevertheless look behind those assurances to check they are true? [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 12:06 pm
, 90 J. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 1:15 am
Jeremy draws attention to a recent piece of research by Paul J. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 3:18 am
If you ever doubted that this is true, consider the episode related below. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 9:52 am
Likewise, in the J&J case, the plaintiff didn’t contest the reliability of the surveys cited in the challenged ad, whereas unreliability was CareDx’s entire claim.Deception and materiality: also sufficiently alleged. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 1:28 pm
I thought I was done with this piece of news for a while, but then along came Wesley J. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 10:29 am
In doing that, the plaintiffs’ evidence is accepted as true, and the defendants’ evidence is evaluated only to determine if it defeats the plaintiffs’ showing as a matter of law. [read post]
