Search for: "JOHN DOES 1 -10"
Results 3461 - 3480
of 9,147
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2016, 8:27 am
By John M. [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:30 pm
Possibility: (1) not enough legit services; (2) legit services aren’t enough; (3) we will never eradicate piracy. [read post]
3 May 2016, 10:41 am
Outgoing Senator John Crown introduced the Defamation (Amendment) Bill 2014 into the Seanad to limit the damages certain public bodies may receive in defamation actions. [read post]
2 May 2016, 5:30 pm
The preferred wording will provide that the exclusion does not apply until there is (1) an adjudication in the underlying proceeding (2) that is final, and (3) that is non-appealable. [read post]
2 May 2016, 11:26 am
But here’s a brief summary. 1. [read post]
2 May 2016, 3:15 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 11:25 am
But whatever you think and whatever John Whittingdale might say he believes, there will be no meaningful action. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 9:01 am
He influenced me greatly 'look what Jerry Lewis does---he helps these folks out, and its a big person who gives back when they don't have to.' It's a huge reason why I try to get involved and help out as many wonderful non-profits (on a 1/100000th scale) it's important to give back. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 8:42 am
So to call a registration incontestable is, I think, misleading and inappropriate.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 8:22 am
Based upon this setup, Heartland argues (1) that it does not “reside” in Delaware for venue purposes according to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 2:35 am
It states that harassment includes causing alarm or distress, but does not attempt to define it beyond that. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 5:30 am
But John, how can that be you may ask. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 8:24 pm
But John, how can that be you may ask. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 9:39 am
It does not arise in other equal protection settings. [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 4:38 am
No one does except you. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 8:06 am
Let me deal with them one-by-one, beginning in this initial post with:1. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
"Significantly, the Appellate Division observed that it is well settled that [1] an employee's displeasure with a work assignment, absent an adverse impact on his or her civil service grade or title, salary or benefits, does not implicate Civil Service Law §75, citing Galatti v County of Dutchess, 64 NY2d 1163, and [2] the assignments of the detectives were within the sole discretion of "the appointing officer. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 10:00 pm
But USDA economist John Bovay, author of the report, said that existing FDA categories were used in the study. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 8:56 am
Lane, which attempted to settle this doctrine after twenty years of struggling with ideas first advanced by Justice John Marshall Harlan in 1969, recognized two exceptions to its “non-retroactivity rule:” (1) new “watershed rules of criminal procedure” should be “fully retroactive” (that is, available on collateral review even for “final” cases); (2) and so too should be “new substantive rules. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 6:39 am
Here are the formal charges.Meantime, I miss John Pacenti on our beat. [read post]
