Search for: "MATTER OF P S"
Results 3461 - 3480
of 18,876
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2020, 6:07 am
Almost 15 years ago, Elton, Gruber, and Busse (2004) and Hortacsu and Syverson (2004), documented substantial price dispersion for essentially identical S&P 500 index funds. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
The Center for Political Accountability found 332 companies in the S&P 500 prohibited some kind of political spending, like funding political committees, or disclosed some or all of their election-related spending in 2020, up roughly nine percent from 2016. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 8:30 pm
Secrecy prevents meaningful public policy debates on these matters of extreme importance: the public can’t respond to abuses of power if it can’t see them. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 2:06 pm
Pai's views on the matter were unknown until today when he issued a statement saying that he will open a rule-making process to clarify that the First Amendment does not give social media companies "special immunity. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 12:44 pm
The proposed regulations provide that BOEM may require a party to provide additional security if the party does not meet at least one of the following criteria: The operator has an issuer credit rating from a nationally recognized statistical rating organization (NRSRO) greater than or equal to either BB- from S&P Global Ratings or Ba3 form Moody’s Investor Service, or an equivalent credit rating provided by an SEC-recognized NRSRO or a proxy credit rating… [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 12:44 pm
In connection therewith, under the proposed regulations, instead of relying primarily on net worth to determine whether a lessee must provide additional security, BOEM would primarily consider a lessee’s credit rating. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 7:01 am
” Id. at p. 11. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 5:21 am
It is true that "[p]rivate civil suits, individually and certainly in the aggregate, do not only advance the parties' private interests, but also further the public's interest in enforcing legal and social norms. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 2:22 am
The post-hoc responder rates based on consistency of improved walking speed were significantly higher in all three active-dose groups (35%, 36% and 39%) compared to placebo (9%; p<0006 for each dose group, adjusting for multiple comparisons) (see paragraph [0121] and Figure 7). [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 2:47 pm
Your vote matters and here’s how to cast it in Wisconsin. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 1:18 pm
Firm P assigned Lawyer to represent Plaintiffs. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 8:08 am
To say that editing a statement and adding commentary in this context does not "creat[e] or develo[p]" the final product, even in part, is dubious…. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 7:36 am
“New Challenges in Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments”, in Franco Ferrari, Diego P. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 6:35 am
Let’s add another p-word to the mix: pragmatism. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 6:35 am
Let’s add another p-word to the mix: pragmatism. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 8:05 pm
The Moral Prohibition Against Abortion is Even Clearer and (if Anything) More CategoricalNo such subsequent development in Church doctrine was necessary with respect to abortion: As Barrett and Garvey wrote, even as of 1998, the Church’s moral injunction against abortion was understood to be “absolute” (p.307)—i.e., that it’s a “flat,” or categorical, prohibition (p.316), and that therefore moral questions… [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 12:18 pm
”Seth P. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 11:29 am
" (p. 1724) Is it fair to say, Judge Barrett, that your own textualist and originalist jurisprudential commitments (like Justice Scalia's) more often yield results that you regard as determinate, and would thus make it more likely that you would find some precedents not just wrong, but demonstrably and clearly wrong? [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 8:17 am
”Seth P. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 3:45 am
Most cases before the Court are mundane legal matters. [read post]
