Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US" Results 3461 - 3480 of 4,555
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Oct 2011, 6:49 am by ERIC J DIRGA PA
” We believe that the “plainly audible” standard is no less precise than the “loud and raucous” standard approved by the United States Supreme Court in City of Cincinnati v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 6:43 am by Bexis
We found the decision in Mills v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 6:42 am by Tejinder Singh
After the Ninth Circuit denied rehearing en banc in United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 8:42 pm by Joshua Wright
  By way of contrast, today’s antitrust analysis of alleged exclusionary conduct begins with (ironically enough) the U.S. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 2:49 pm by Josh Wright
  By way of contrast, today’s antitrust analysis of alleged exclusionary conduct begins with (ironically enough) the U.S. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 3:28 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Back when I was a summer associate at White & Case, we used to talk about SEC v. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 7:38 am by frank_bennett
We’ll begin with the following sample citation in the OSCOLA style: Jones & others v Wright [1991] 3 All ER 88. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:28 am by judith
  We need to think about subject access beyond the standard, familiar hierarchical “subjects” that we have come to use in our existing taxonomies, indexing, and classification systems. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 10:37 am by Jasmine Joseph
I argue that there are multiple roles of human rights within multi-level political orders, and that these give rise to different standards for various actions. [read post]