Search for: "People v. White"
Results 3461 - 3480
of 7,221
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2016, 9:35 am
As is how people are to get to access the remaining courts, because the MoJ based travel time estimates on having a car… But no matter, because even if there was a local court open, it is unlikely that people could get representation anyway. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 11:16 am
” But many people find whites putting on makeup to look black to be offensive. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 10:40 am
Amant v. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 2:29 pm
In People v. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 2:29 pm
In People v. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 10:52 am
Providing separate drinking fountains for blacks and whites and relegating black restaurant patrons to take-out windows, with sit-down service reserved for whites, convey clear messages of racial degradation. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 11:11 am
In Texas Workforce Commission v. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 5:45 am
As VC readers know (see Eugene’s post here), the Supreme Court has agreed to hear the case of Lee v. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 8:24 am
The Last Throes of the British Pro-Nazi Right, 1940-45), Bill V. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 1:43 pm
Even under the appropriately exacting standards of New York Times v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 7:35 am
That means that longstanding precedent, such as Roe v. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 10:01 am
That year, the Court handed down Hamdan v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 8:47 am
Tillerson has close ties with President Vladimir V. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 11:03 am
Schaefer v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 6:09 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 1:51 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 8:09 am
The two most important precedential decisions the courts rely on in such cases are California Supreme Court cases: White v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 8:00 am
The two most important precedential decisions the courts rely on in such cases are California Supreme Court cases: White v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 11:10 am
The US Department of Labor (DOL) is appealing the November 22 Nevada v US Department of Labor ruling preliminarily enjoining DOL from implementing or enforcing a modification to the DOL Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) White Collar Exemption Regulations that would have nearly doubled the minimum salary that an employer must pay an employee on a salaried basis in reliance on the White Collar Exemption. [read post]
