Search for: "Scalia v. United States" Results 3461 - 3480 of 4,639
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
 Jeanne Sheehan ZainoOn the Sanctity of the ConstitutionThe seven most important words in American history, “We the people of the United States,” were written by Gouverneur Morris. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 4:24 am by SHG
United States, 232 U.S. 383 (1914), our jurisprudence lurched back and forth between imposing a categorical warrant requirement and looking to reasonableness alone. [read post]
Moreover, his votes in the COVID-related cases from this past summer, South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Had one looked at this issue in 1921, the United States would have had company: At that time, Australia and Canada, countries that, like the United States, were influenced by the British tradition, provided judges with indefinite tenure during good behavior.[3]However, each of these countries amended their constitutions and adopted mandatory retirement ages for their federal judges later in the 20thcentury – 70 in Australia, 75 in Canada. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 9:00 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
In a 2008 interview with CBS News, Scalia declared, “[T]here are anti-abortion people who think that the Constitution requires a state to prohibit abortion. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 9:06 am by annalthouse@gmail.com (Ann Althouse)
United States (08-1394), the Court affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded in a main opinion by Justice Ginsburg. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 4:05 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Integra Lifesciences I, Ltd., Justice Scalia held that the defendants’ use of the RGD peptide was permissible under the Patent Act’s provision that it is not “an act of [patent] infringement to . . . use . . . or import into the United States a potential invention . . . solely for uses reasonably related to the development and submission of information under a Federal law which regulates the . . . use . . . of drugs. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 10:13 am by Kiran Bhat
United States and reached different results in cases involving the revocation of a defendant’s supervised release. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 8:55 am by Gideon
As Justice Scalia put it, concurring in Maryland v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 9:34 am by Diana L. Skaggs
      Although family mobility has been global for decades, the United States Supreme Court, for the first time,[1] has interpreted a provision of the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, a treaty to which the United States is a contracting state. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 11:15 am by John Elwood
Banco Para el Comercio Exterior de Cuba or standard rules of agency, and whether a tort claim for personal injuries suffered in connection with travel outside of the United States is “based upon” the act occurring outside of the United States or the sale of the ticket in the United States for travel outside of the country. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 3:15 pm by Mark Walsh
Securities and Exchange Commission, about whether that agency’s administrative law judges are “officers” of the United States under the Constitution’s appointments clause. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 7:49 am by Nabiha Syed
United States and Tolentino v. [read post]