Search for: "State v. Davi" Results 3461 - 3480 of 5,660
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2024, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
It appears that Johnston was not keen on becoming the Jefferson Davis of the left, so he backpedaled, stating, “Would I have taken it back if I could? [read post]
16 May 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  And as Buckley points out, the case that presented the greatest challenge in this regard was Confederate President Jefferson Davis’s treason prosecution.The Supreme Court’s decision in Texas v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 10:42 am by Mark Walsh
The chief justice (of the United States, that is), then announces that Justice Neil Gorsuch has the opinion of the court in Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 6:11 am
 Further, the Scarborough decision cites to Davis v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 10:05 am by Lyle Denniston
It seemed clear, last June, when the Court ordered a halt to the subsidies, that at least a majority of the Court thought the system might run afoul of the Justices’ 5-4 decision in Davis v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 1:28 am
Langer of Davis & Cannon, LLP, Sheridan, Wyoming.Representing Appellee Maverick Country Stores: Steven T. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 9:40 pm
  An insured may not elect to proceed with a trial by jury when an equitable remedy, such as relief from forfeiture, is sought.Here is the citation: Peters v. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 12:26 pm by Andrew Hamm
Doe 21-968Issues: (1) Whether a recipient of federal funding may be liable in damages in a private action under Davis v. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 3:57 am by Russell Knight
“Dissolution proceedings are designed to dispose of all matters connected with the dissolution of a marriage” Davis v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:31 am by Amy Howe
In The New Yorker, Lincoln Caplan weighs in on last week’s decision in Davis v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 2:56 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
The court concluded that site-specific standing is required to bring each section 4(f) claim, citing Davis v. [read post]