Search for: "State v. Light" Results 3461 - 3480 of 29,346
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2015, 7:51 am by Joel R. Brandes
The ultimate question in a Rule 12(b)(6) motion is whether the complaint states a valid claim when it is viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. . [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 11:05 am
Applying this standard, the Court found that, in addressing the debt-equity question, the Tax Court properly evaluated the facts of the case in light of many of the factors deemed relevant by applicable case law, including the adequacy of capitalization of the businesses, availability of outside financing, the presence of written promissory notes, the presence of stated loan terms, the unsecured position of the advances, the failure of the businesses to comply with interest and… [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 6:14 am
The 9th does remand though under Ameline in light of Booker's advisory Guidelines holding.U.S. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 7:56 am by LaBovick Law
The whistleblower case, Graham County Soil & Water Conservation District v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 12:12 pm by Kevin Sheerin
Matter of Idella Abram v New York State Division of Human Rights, City of Buffalo and Buffalo State Police Department Petitioner brought about this Article 78 proceeding to annul a determination of the New York State Division of Human Rights (Division) which ruled that she failed to establish that respondents discriminated against her based on a disability or retaliated against her based on her filing of a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission… [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 7:00 am by Kali Borkoski
In light of the Skilling decision, federal prosecutors are seeking a new trial for former New York State Senator Joseph Bruno, who was convicted under the more sweeping definition of honest services. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 11:53 am by Wells C. Bennett
Circuit’s Guantanamo detention saga: Suleiman v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 7:59 am by Kevin LaCroix
  As discussed here, on May 18, 2011, the California Intermediate Court of Appeal held in the Luther v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 11:53 am
So reminds the Second Department, Appellate Division: The Supreme Court should have granted that branch of the appellant's motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiffs' third cause of action insofar as asserted against it for failure to state a cause of action (see Light v Light, 64 AD3d 633). [read post]