Search for: "State v. Sample"
Results 3461 - 3480
of 4,110
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2012, 4:07 pm
The discovery obligations with respect to statistician expert witnesses vary considerably among state and federal courts. [read post]
21 May 2019, 11:57 pm
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) of the United States has won the first round of litigation against Qualcomm. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s ruling in Bostock v. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 5:45 pm
Samples from three of the HUS patients with E. coli O121:H19 were laboratory-confirmed as genetic matches through DNA sub-typing using Pulsed Field Gel Electrophoresis (PFGE), confirming that their E. coli infections all came from the same source. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 9:28 pm
See United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 12:29 pm
A state judge and I were attempting to settle large numbers of asbestos cases. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 8:24 pm
Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. [read post]
1 May 2017, 11:56 am
The case is NuScience Corp. v. [read post]
25 May 2025, 2:18 pm
For the cynical, this announcement can be seen as the EPA response to American Water Works Association, et al. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 3:58 pm
Notwithstanding numerous amendments to the statute since Doe v Pataki, the Court of Appeals has consistently held that SORA, " is not a penal statute and the registration requirement is not a criminal sentence. [read post]
1 May 2017, 11:56 am
The case is NuScience Corp. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 1:19 am
A.Nagaraja) A sample of readers reactions as carried in The Hindu is here, here and here. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 5:32 am
The case is NuScience Corp. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 8:44 am
However, a landmark 2010 ruling by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court in Papadopoulos v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 10:42 pm
Many of the cases reviewed were the ones that have been summarized in previous posts to this blog, such as the excess insurance case of Kropa v. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm
The agency explained that the ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 9:37 am
NB: Scholars have spent considerable energy debating this statutory phrase and how it should be read; was an important sub-theme at the Court’s recent oral argument in the pending case, Concepcion v. [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 11:57 am
Mass.) in Affleck v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 10:02 pm
Hearn cites a 1997 Supreme Court case (Old Chief v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 7:30 pm
The California supreme court in Donohue v. [read post]
