Search for: "Strong v. State" Results 3461 - 3480 of 16,386
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2008, 9:37 am
Client: We have sales representatives all over the United States. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 2:33 am by gmlevine
The goal is achieved through “a strong body of precedent” which “is strongly persuasive” even if not binding, Pantaloon Retail India Limited v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 8:51 am by Nicholas Bronni
Nicholas Bronni serves as the solicitor general for the state of Arkansas, which co-authored an amicus brief joined by 14 other states supporting the government in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 12:58 pm by Rosalind English
R (on the application of Amada Bizimana) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 414 In the wake of France’s apparently unencumbered expulsion of individuals on public interest grounds there has been a fresh outcry from the press about the shackles imposed by the Human Rights Convention on the UK authorities which other signatory states seem to ignore with impunity. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 12:15 pm
In Rochester the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, held that PERB abused its discretion when it decided that the City of Rochester committed an improper employer practice in violation of Civil Service Law §209-a(1)(a) (The Taylor Law) by denying city police officers, who were union members, access to union representation during a criminal investigation interview.The Fourth Department said that "PERB abused its discretion in expanding a public employee's rights to include… [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 9:30 pm by Lawrence W. Sherman
As an assistant to New York City’s then-Police Commissioner, Patrick V. [read post]
31 May 2012, 7:20 am by Ilya Somin
Texas has stated that it considers black and Latino students “under-represented” at the university, based in part on their proportions in the state population. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 11:52 am by Joy Waltemath
A federal court overseeing a federal and state-law overtime action refused to enforce mandatory arbitration agreements instituted by the employer after the putative class and collective action complaint was filed, finding strong indications the arbitration policy was unveiled in an attempt to prevent employees from joining the collective. [read post]