Search for: "B. R." Results 3481 - 3500 of 55,756
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2013, 8:08 am by Debra A. McCurdy
CMS has posted the April 2013 Medicare Part B ASP files.CMS observes that average drug prices in the market generally remain stable, with prices for the top Part B drugs decreasing by 0.5% from the first to second quarter of 2013. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 4:30 am by Peter J. Toren
The new Section 1836(b) provides for both equitable and monetary relief. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 2:15 am by Erin Knese
In In re Bigcommerce, No. 2018-120, the court addressed the territorial bounds mapped by the phrase “judicial district” in § 1400(b). [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 10:34 am
So basically party A needs access over a lot owned by B. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 1:14 pm
OWNERSHIP EXPENSE NOT ALLOWED IF VEHICLE PAID FOR In re Howell, Case No. 06-11652 April 2007, Judge Nugent Trustee objected to 13 confirmation under 1325(b)(1)(B) on basis that debtors projected disposable income was too low because they were deducted an ownership expense on Line 28 of B22C even though vehicle was fully paid for and even though they [...] [read post]
9 May 2017, 6:15 am by James Cosgrove
Nothing herein should be interpreted as advice as to how a particular patent applicant should or should not respond to a § 112(a) or (b) rejection. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 6:15 am by Russell Slifer
It is clear that the current regulations are almost exclusively focused § 316(b)’s “the ability of the Office to timely complete proceedings” and not the other language of § 316(b): “the effect of any such regulation on the economy”, “the efficient administration of the Office” or “the integrity of the patent system. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 2:35 pm by Jeralyn
"Faux-Dem" Mike B. is blanketing the airwaves in every Super Tuesday state. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 7:04 am
Question: Which candidates support Proposal A and which support Proposal B? [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 5:30 am by Gene Quinn
This is possible thanks to 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C). [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 5:45 am by Gene Quinn
In the majority opinion Chen made much of the civil procedure aspects of a 12(b)(6) motion, as well he should. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 11:00 pm by Courtenay Brinckerhoff
Kappos Patent Term Adjustment (PTA) case (1:12cv574) (Exelixis II) that affirms the USPTO’s interpretation of 35 USC § 154(b)(1)(B)(i). [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 4:15 am by Lewis Hudnell
§ 282(b), not a cognizable defense in a patent litigation? [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 10:50 am by Gene Quinn
Legally speaking, the United States, or in this case the United States Postal Service, is considered a “person” within the meaning of AIA § 18(a)(1)(B). [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 6:46 pm by Courtenay Brinckerhoff
., who are challenging the USPTO’s interpretation of 35 USC § 154(b)(1)(B)(i)). [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 2:32 am by atussey@mortgagefraudblog.com
American Modification Consultants, LLC, d/b/a American Mitigation Consultants; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and INQB8 LLC, d/b/a Discount Mortgage Relief, Scottsdale, Arizona, had lawsuits filed against them for offering to negotiate or modify the terms or conditions of an existing home mortgage from requesting advance payments from homeowners. [read post]