Search for: "Does 1 - 20"
Results 3481 - 3500
of 28,803
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2011, 8:55 pm
. § 626(f)(1) (the “OWBPA”), does not preclude an employer from compelling claims of age discrimination into an arbitral forum. [read post]
12 Sep 2006, 11:28 am
Thus at that stage the district court is free to consider what the sentence would be under a ratio (such as 20:1) that more accurately reflects the seriousness of crack in relation to powder. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 8:50 pm
Of course, this does not mean that there do not continue to be problems with lead in children's products. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 12:59 pm
Author: Steven Cernak Most antitrust practitioners, even members of the general public, have a good intuitive sense of what Sherman Act Section 1 is aimed at. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 6:12 am
The court held: “Where the parties have agreed on the amount of damages, ascertained by estimation and adjustment, and have expressed this agreement in clear and unambiguous terms, the amount so fixed should be treated as liquidated damages and not as a penalty, if the damages would be (1) uncertain as to amount and difficult of proof, and if (2) the contract as a whole is not so manifestly unconscionable, unreasonable, and disproportionate in amount as to justify the conclusion that… [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 9:13 am
Like the evidence in the specification, theprosecution history weighs towards a construction of‘monoclonal antibodies’ which does not include chimeric orhumanized antibodies. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 3:05 pm
1: United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 3:32 pm
While the CEO-to-worker compensation ratio is down from 302-to-1 in 2014, it is still light years beyond the 20-to-1 ratio in 1965. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
Any coverage for investigational treatment would be considered per WAC 296-20-02850. [read post]
13 May 2011, 2:17 pm
The defendant does not admit fault under the settlement. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 7:27 am
According to NMFS, the species does not warrant listing at this time. [read post]
22 May 2014, 4:31 am
Here are three new items: 1. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 10:39 am
Torres 1. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 1:30 am
We conclude that ORS 109.070 (2003) does not violate Article I, section 20, but that ORS 109.243 does. [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 9:02 am
The decision seems formalistic, but Section 1(a)(2) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 7:32 am
The 2011 Wage Rule prohibits the use of private surveys except where an otherwise applicable OES survey does not provide any data for an occupation in a specific geographical location, or where the OES survey does not accurately represent the relevant job classification. [read post]
Automated Decision-Making Under the GDPR – A Right for Individuals or A Prohibition for Controllers?
20 Oct 2017, 7:57 am
But the language of Article 22(1) does not state this. [read post]
Automated Decision-Making Under the GDPR – A Right for Individuals or A Prohibition for Controllers?
20 Oct 2017, 7:57 am
But the language of Article 22(1) does not state this. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 1:10 pm
” (1) Name: Use the name you put on your resume. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 2:31 pm
Question #1 – Does OPM maintain its own public registry of individuals and entities who have been debarred or suspended from the FEHBP program? [read post]
