Search for: "Figures v. Figures"
Results 3481 - 3500
of 15,515
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2020, 6:59 am
In Dariel M. v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 3:10 pm
In my experience, defenders of liability in Snyder v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 11:59 am
Philip v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 4:42 am
California and United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:37 am
Is the PCC too focussed on public figures? [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 11:45 am
In Akorn, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 12:13 pm
Dickinson v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 6:15 am
Peter Batty It’s amazing what the police can figure out if they just have your cell site location information (CSLI) data. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 12:18 pm
As the claimant proffered a lower diminution figure, it failed to meet its burden of establishing an entitlement to higher severance damages. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 6:37 am
Immediately after enactment, the "experts" quickly reached a consensus that it didn't really change much but had just codified the pre-existing case law of Teague v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 8:19 am
Across the top of the table are figures for various net income needs, ranging from £10,000 to £300,000. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 6:07 am
This places a variable in the equation that is hard for plaintiffs to adequately calculate a hard figure. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 6:15 am
Peter Batty It’s amazing what the cops can figure out if they just have your cell site location information (CSLI) data. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 10:43 am
Trump v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 10:45 pm
By the way, Apple doesn't like it at all when a comma is inserted between Apple and Inc., which happens all the time and was one of 271 typos and similar errors in last year's Epic Games v. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 11:29 am
The CJEU decision The case concerned an opposition against the figurative mark BLACK LABEL BY EQUIVALENZA on the basis of the earlier figurative mark LABELL. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 7:30 am
State v. [read post]
22 Dec 2018, 7:22 am
Some like holes in the groundLong v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 4:32 am
Indeed, the two signs were considered to be decorative patterns, not figurative marks: all they could do was to inform the relevant public about the quality, the luxury value and the high prestige of the goods and services in the applied-for classes. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 1:46 am
In an interesting decision delivered earlier this month concerning an opposition filed by DC Comics, which owns the figurative mark “SUPERMAN” (pictured below), the EUIPO Opposition Division acknowledged that this mark enjoys a high degree of recognition and, as such, is eligible for protection under Article 8(5) EU Trade Mark Regulation (EUTMR), even despite that the well-known character of the trade mark had been only sufficiently demonstrated for one class of goods (Class 16)… [read post]
