Search for: "Grant v. Superior Court"
Results 3481 - 3500
of 6,581
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2012, 5:30 am
The plaintiffs moved to remand this action to the Superior Court, and the District Court granted the plaintiffs’ motion. [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 2:16 pm
Superior Court, 51 Cal. 4th 310 (2011). [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 10:11 am
Superior Court (Galfano), no. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 3:00 am
Dunson v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 8:16 am
Supreme Court’s ruling in Janus v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 5:37 pm
California Clean Energy Commission v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
Petition for review after the Court of Appeal granted a petition for peremptory writ of mandate. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 5:15 am
He moved to dismiss the charges for lack of venue and the Superior Court of Clayton County granted the motion. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 9:35 am
Pritchard v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 4:27 am
In Alves v 152-154 W. 131st St. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
The question whether the administrative exhaustion requirement is jurisdictional was the subject of a circuit split—a conflict among federal appellate courts—that is often a factor that motivates the Supreme Court to grant certiorari and review a case.The Supreme Court’s Ruling in Fort Bend County v. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 12:11 pm
He was eventually granted twice-weekly visits. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 12:11 pm
He was eventually granted twice-weekly visits. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 6:00 am
June 2, 2014), the Pennsylvania Superior Court ruled in a case of first impression that information retrieved from a vehicle's black box was admissible in a criminal court proceeding.The Safka case arose out of charges of vehicular homicide and other moving violations. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 9:02 am
Additional Resources: Brome v. [read post]
8 May 2008, 12:31 am
Superior Court, 51 Cal. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 1:04 pm
Superior Court, 51 Cal. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 7:15 am
State v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 9:53 am
In Daly v. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 7:39 pm
The decision tracks my November prediction that the Court would follow its reasoning in Ultratec, Inc. v. [read post]