Search for: "Head v State"
Results 3481 - 3500
of 14,768
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2019, 8:16 am
For one of the prior cases on this, Morris v. [read post]
20 Jul 2019, 7:03 am
" Chapter 94, Note 1(h) states that "This Chapter does not cover . . . [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 1:57 pm
Supreme Court ruled in Lamps Plus, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 10:09 am
See United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 9:26 am
Kantor & Kantor won a notable victory against the Life Insurance Company of North America (also known as “LINA” or “Cigna”) in Elliott v. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 4:30 am
MorningStar Fellowship Church, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Texas Court Rejects Once-Suspended Doctor's Lawsuit Over Reporting of the Suspension
16 Jul 2019, 5:01 am
From Day v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 2:25 am
The post Series of ERISA Retirement Benefit Cases Head to Supreme Court Docket appeared first on HR Daily Advisor. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 10:48 am
Washinton v. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 8:58 pm
More recently, Gregory Shill of the University of Iowa College of Law describes in The Atlantic how the law effectively compels the use of the automobile, repeating the 1977 SCOTUS reference in Wooley v. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 4:56 pm
United States The Federal Trade Commission voted to approve a fine of roughly [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 12:54 pm
Less than a year after its decision in Case C-337/17 Feniks (discussed here), the Court of Justice had another opportunity to consider the extent to which the Brussels Ia Regulation provides a head of special jurisdiction for an actio pauliana. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 8:53 am
The heading appears misleading because the text contradicts it: “Scientists often develop emotional attachments to their work—it can be difficult to abandon an idea. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 5:58 pm
*Citing Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, 169 AD2d 943, the Appellate Division dismissed Plaintiff's appeal as moot, explaining that because the report objected to by Plaintiff has been publicly available from multiple sources, including the OATH and LEXIS websites, for a considerable period of time, it could not provide Petitioner any meaningful relief.In addition, it should be noted that with respect to the publication of… [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 5:58 pm
*Citing Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, 169 AD2d 943, the Appellate Division dismissed Plaintiff's appeal as moot, explaining that because the report objected to by Plaintiff has been publicly available from multiple sources, including the OATH and LEXIS websites, for a considerable period of time, it could not provide Petitioner any meaningful relief.In addition, it should be noted that with respect to the publication of… [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 4:14 am
The case is Massey v. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 8:00 am
Supreme Court’s decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 7:41 am
A July 2, 2019, judgment of the Environmental Review Tribunal in Alizadeh v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 1:06 pm
” Most of it strikes me as basically a restatement of Frankfurter’s anguished dissent in Baker v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 5:03 am
State cases; the Flanders v. [read post]
