Search for: "In Re CAL" Results 3481 - 3500 of 5,815
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2010, 5:18 am by Michael McCann
Breer highlights the excellent work of BC Assistant Dean Warren Zola, who serves as Chairman of the Panel.Here's an excerpt:* * *Boston College won’t be mistaken for Southern Cal or Florida as an NFL pipeline. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 10:47 am by Steven G. Pearl
The California Supreme Court granted review and held pending its decision in In re Tobacco II Cases (2009) 46 Cal.4th 298 (Tobacco II), which concerned standing issues arising from the 2004 amendment to the UCL by Proposition 64. [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
., Cal.) have called for activists to harass conservatives in public places and “push back on them and you tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 10:30 am by Kent Berk
According to a recent case in California, In re Estate of Giraldin, 290 P3d 199 (Cal 2012), as well as a “trio” of similar cases, the trustee’s fiduciary duty may also extend to alternate, or remote, designated beneficiaries for actions taken while the trust was still revocable. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 8:57 am
I am all for finding the beauty in the everyday, but who do they think they’re kidding??? [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 3:38 pm by Glenn Reynolds
DAVID BERNSTEIN CORRECTS THE RECORD: It seems that liberal commenters on constitutional law just can’t resist bringing of the issue of child labor, regardless of whether what they’re saying is historically accurate. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 12:48 pm by Sonya Hubbard
We first saw this in 2005, when Michelle wrote this post about the company’s lucrative send-off for “Chairman Emeritus” Cal Turner, Jr. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 10:20 am by Ginzburg & Bronshteyn, APC
  An important case in this area is In re Marriage of Rossi, 90 Cal.App.4th 34 (2001) 108 Cal.Rptr.2d 270, 01 Cal. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 11:48 am by Katie Culliton
So, while employers must keep these work-related injuries and illnesses forms for their own records and to provide copies to appropriate requesters, they’re no longer required to publicly post the annual summary. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 7:30 am
Second, the court improperly placed an implied burden on Father when it stated in its order that the reason for his move was to "join a new wife," something that was not "sufficiently necessary;" this is contrary to the California Supreme Court ruling in In re Marriage of Burgess (1996) 13 Cal.4th 25 that a moving custodial parent is not required to show necessity. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 12:00 am by Sex Offender Issues
Alabama (1969) 395 U.S. 238 and In re Tahl (1969) 1 Cal.3d 122. [read post]
12 Aug 2007, 9:18 am by Dean T. Kirby, Jr.
In re Duggan, 2007 WL 2155704 (Bankr.N.D.Cal. [read post]