Search for: "In The Matter Of: Jones" Results 3481 - 3500 of 6,018
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2012, 9:01 am
Jones, 1 S.W.3d 83 (Tex. 1999) (holding that the NCAA’s appeal from an injunction granted at the trial court level was not moot as to the applicability of retroactive penalties). [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 9:01 am
Jones, 1 S.W.3d 83 (Tex. 1999) (holding that the NCAA’s appeal from an injunction granted at the trial court level was not moot as to the applicability of retroactive penalties). [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 6:10 am by Tim Epstein
Jones, 1 S.W.3d 83 (Tex. 1999) (holding that the NCAA’s appeal from an injunction granted at the trial court level was not moot as to the applicability of retroactive penalties). [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 6:54 am
Accordingly, the Circuit Court remanded the matter to the district court to “proceed to trial on the amount of maintenance and cure due” the seaman. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 12:24 pm by P.J. Blount
Jones involves a trespass (placing a GPS tracker onto the underside of a vehicle) with the intent to uncover information. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 3:47 am by Laura Sandwell
On Wednesday 25 July 2012 the Supreme Court was listed to hear Jones (by Caldwell) v First Tier Tribunal and Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority, but the matter has been adjourned. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:24 pm by Tessa Shepperson
Frazzles and I went to see Tom Jones last night at Sandown Racetrack. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 5:16 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Jones and Marshall Walthew of the Philadelphia office of Pepper Hamilton LLP for forwarding this decision to my attention. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 7:29 am by Trey Mills
  Other articles I encountered while putting this article together provide varying insights: Ragland & Jones, LLP -provides 8 things to do if you encounter adulterated food:   Immediately alert your restaurant server; Get medical care; Document proof of purchase; Secure physical evidence; Take photographs; Make a complaint; Notify health agencies; and Inquire about your legal rights. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 5:30 am
Martin's age and license were initially a concern in the matter, but these issues have been dismissed. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 8:09 am by Jay Stanley
In Jones,the Supreme Court declared that long-standing Fourth Amendment doctrine still matters even as changing technology creates new privacy risks. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 7:19 am
The company recently agreed to a $15 million settlement to resolve the matter. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 7:19 am
The company recently agreed to a $15 million settlement to resolve the matter. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 6:12 am by Walter Olson
” Because of course parents are supposed to be guided by their kids’ wishes as to whether to set loose the lawyers in such matters. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 6:54 am by Marilyn Stowe
This relatively tiny case has caused waves amongst family lawyers in Scotland – rather like Jones v Kernott did in England and Wales in 2011. [read post]