Search for: "In re Grant" Results 3481 - 3500 of 33,768
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2012, 7:50 am by Don Cruse
Direct appeal challenging the constitutionality of the margins tax IN RE NESTLE USA, INC., No. 12-0518 Granted for argument on August 24, 2012 I wrote a little about this case last month in “Nestle II: Revisiting the Texas business-margins tax”. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 1:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
In re Tanaka Decision Likely to Drive Two-Part Supplemental Examination Filing Strategy During yesterday’s Strafford Legal webinar on the topic, I explained that Supplemental Examination (SE) is a mechanism of the AIA that is designed to effectively cure inequitable conduct via a new post grant proceeding of the USPTO. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 11:14 am by Dennis Crouch
  The license agreement also included specific “exculpatory clauses” that indicated no remedy would be available for the Army’s refusal to approve proposals: [Authentic] shall not have any rights against [the Army] for damages or other remedies by reason of [the Army]’s failure or refusal to grant any approval [of product line or] advertising. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 10:37 am
  Most of the time, it’s because you’re spread too thin. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 10:21 pm
  They simply wanted the EPO to re-examine its patent policies by raising the standards required to gain patent protection in Europe. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 3:14 am
Brian Higgins's Maryland IP Law Blog post about the progeny of In re Seagate, 497 F.3d 1360 (Fed. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 9:21 pm
  They simply wanted the EPO to re-examine its patent policies by raising the standards required to gain patent protection in Europe. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 1:29 am
 It is for the party resisting the grant of the stay to show why it should not be granted. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 2:23 pm
I’ll be in the way guys yell when they’re mad. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 10:30 am by Biersdorf & Associates
  The case in question, In re Texas Rice Land Partners, Ltd. raised one question: whether TransCanada, the company seeking to install the pipeline, possessed eminent domain power – the power to take private property for public use. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 10:30 am by Biersdorf & Associates
  The case in question, In re Texas Rice Land Partners, Ltd. raised one question: whether TransCanada, the company seeking to install the pipeline, possessed eminent domain power – the power to take private property for public use. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 10:30 am by Biersdorf & Associates
  The case in question, In re Texas Rice Land Partners, Ltd. raised one question: whether TransCanada, the company seeking to install the pipeline, possessed eminent domain power – the power to take private property for public use. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 10:30 am by Biersdorf & Associates
  The case in question, In re Texas Rice Land Partners, Ltd. raised one question: whether TransCanada, the company seeking to install the pipeline, possessed eminent domain power – the power to take private property for public use. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 6:12 pm by Dennis Crouch
Neapco Holdings LLC, et al., No. 20-891 (CVSG requested May 3, 2021); Res Judicata and the Patent-Specific Kessler Doctrine: PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC v. [read post]