Search for: "Matter of Bright" Results 3481 - 3500 of 5,383
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2013, 5:49 am
Wear reflective clothing and bright colors to help ensure that you're seen by everyone. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 6:22 am
Wear bright or retro-reflective clothing and make your maneuvers in traffic predictable. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 8:17 pm by Ron
As willing beta testers, NetApp Legal is on weekly strategy calls with these cutting-edge professionals, developing new, real-time reports to track and analyze everything from what a ‘right rate’ should be for a particular lawyer in a particular field, to what the ‘right’ number of resources should be on a matter, to billing accuracy…. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 1:17 pm by Ron
The post ACC 2013 Value Champions Suggest Bright Future for Law Firm Alternatives appeared first on Prism Legal. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 12:44 pm by Florian Mueller
For information on the analog YUV format and the related YCbCr digital format, which is often referred to by the term YUV as well, let me refer you to Wikipedia (YUV, YCbCr) and provide my own condensed explanation:While computers generally process and store images in a bitmap format (from left to right, from top to bottom), YUV is a format that separates for each pixel a luminance (brightness, Y) value from two chrominance (color, U and V) values. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:47 am by Holland & Hart
  Bright Line Between Co-Workers and Supervisors Will Aid Employers Facing Harassment Claims  The bright line test that the Court adopted for determining who is deemed a “supervisor” in Title VII cases eliminates murkiness and provides a clear test that reviewing courts can easily apply. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 4:56 am by Jon Hyman
Under this framework therefore, it matters whether a harasser is a “supervisor” or simply a co-worker. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 2:00 am
  At least then the taxpayer would have access to a little relief – no matter how unsavory in the end. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
  This matters because the employer’s liability under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 for workplace harassment committed by supervisors is much stronger than it is for harassment inflicted by co-workers. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 11:56 am by Guest Blogger
Michael GreveFor the symposium on Michael Greve's The Upside Down Constitution (Harvard University Press 2012).Jack Balkin has been a dear friend for many years. [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 7:10 am by David Snyder
The Supreme Court held: [W]e hold there is no bright-line rule prohibiting testimony of bona fide offers into evidence, especially, as in the present case, when a contract has been signed and the offer is used to show that contract’s reasonableness. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 5:53 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Thiscourt has never set forth a bright line rule requiringdistrict courts to construe claims before determiningsubject matter eligibility. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 12:00 pm
  Which is troubling.Especially since there's a clear, bright-line alternative. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 2:05 pm by Kevin Russell
After adopting what seemed to be a bright-line rule, the Court then acknowledged some complications in application. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 4:39 am by David DePaolo
And both had unbelievably bright outlooks on life despite the trauma of their injuries. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 12:46 am by Sean Hayes
The distributor’s staff are very bright, many speak decent or even very good English, and they are already working with or at least very familiar with your target companies. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 2:35 pm by Mitch Kowalski
Mr Wardle is a very bright guy who would add value to the appeals panel. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 1:19 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
” The Court declined to adopt any bright-line rules regarding the application of the harmless-error rule: “Our essential point is that particular facts and circumstances matter. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 7:45 am by Wells Bennett
 On behalf of the government, Joanna Baltes rises and stresses: the case law draws a bright line between arguments on the merits and interlocutory matters, and finds no confrontation or due process problem when the defendant is excluded from the latter. [read post]