Search for: "Million v. Million"
Results 3481 - 3500
of 34,490
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2018, 3:10 pm
The case is General Refractories Co. v First State Insurance Co. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 9:09 pm
“Houston lawyer Warren Todd Hoeffner is accused of paying $3 million in cash, BMWs, trips, even spa treatments and ‘gentleman’s entertainment’" in a scheme to obtain $34 million in settlements in silicosis litigation. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 12:59 pm
(High Commissioner for Pakistan in the United Kingdom v National Westminster Bank (and various interveners)) [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 9:09 pm
“Houston lawyer Warren Todd Hoeffner is accused of paying $3 million in cash, BMWs, trips, even spa treatments and ‘gentleman’s entertainment’" in a scheme to obtain $34 million in settlements in silicosis litigation. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 2:56 pm
Wills v. [read post]
3 Nov 2012, 7:32 pm
That is up from 13.1 million people this year. [read post]
11 May 2011, 1:24 pm
Erwin Chemerinsky -- dean of the UC Irvine School of Law, scholar of federal jurisdiction, and an accomplished appellate advocate -- has this op-ed in the Los Angeles Times on the Supreme Court's decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 10:00 pm
Of the $24 million payout, $22 million will go to the players and $2 million to fund and support future players, development, and programs for women.Even more significant is the collective bargaining agreement, which guarantees equal pay for the women’s team in the future.When preliminary approval of the settlement was requested, Judge Klausner found that the legal requirements were met because the women’s team released the Federation from all discrimination… [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 10:00 pm
The case is Wixen Music Publishing Inc. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 9:23 pm
US v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 8:31 am
[2] Purdue v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 6:16 am
In Medidata Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 2:07 pm
A judge has ordered a 10.5 million dollar Accutane verdict overturned "because the original verdict followed from an unfair trial.During the trial Roche, the maker of Accutane, was not allowed to present evidence regarding how many people used Accutane until the final stages of the trial.The New Jersey Appellate Court ruled that Roche did not have "a full and fair opportunity... to present and advocate the relevant numbers evidence," Bloombery… [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 4:18 pm
In a legal dispute (Aurora S.A. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 9:46 am
In the case, Fridman v. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 8:00 am
Douglas-Banks v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 10:06 am
In that case, Clark v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 7:40 am
In Marin v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 8:00 am
Lang v. [read post]
