Search for: "R. B."
Results 3481 - 3500
of 55,757
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2014, 6:22 pm
Pursuant to SCR 4.300, Canon 5(B)(1)(c) shall become effective February 24,2014. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 4:35 pm
Held real estate foreclosure action which sought to enforce a tax lien against B&P Apartments (B&P), was barred under the doctrine of res […] [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 2:45 am
Anthony B. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 8:08 am
CMS has posted the April 2013 Medicare Part B ASP files.CMS observes that average drug prices in the market generally remain stable, with prices for the top Part B drugs decreasing by 0.5% from the first to second quarter of 2013. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 7:13 am
Kim, Steven Boranian and Joshua B. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 4:30 am
The new Section 1836(b) provides for both equitable and monetary relief. [read post]
15 May 2013, 8:27 am
Kim and Joshua B. [read post]
6 May 2016, 5:45 am
The 6(b) study... [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 2:15 am
In In re Bigcommerce, No. 2018-120, the court addressed the territorial bounds mapped by the phrase “judicial district” in § 1400(b). [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 10:34 am
So basically party A needs access over a lot owned by B. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 1:14 pm
OWNERSHIP EXPENSE NOT ALLOWED IF VEHICLE PAID FOR In re Howell, Case No. 06-11652 April 2007, Judge Nugent Trustee objected to 13 confirmation under 1325(b)(1)(B) on basis that debtors projected disposable income was too low because they were deducted an ownership expense on Line 28 of B22C even though vehicle was fully paid for and even though they [...] [read post]
9 May 2017, 6:15 am
Nothing herein should be interpreted as advice as to how a particular patent applicant should or should not respond to a § 112(a) or (b) rejection. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 6:51 am
The Law Office of Robert B. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 6:15 am
It is clear that the current regulations are almost exclusively focused § 316(b)’s “the ability of the Office to timely complete proceedings” and not the other language of § 316(b): “the effect of any such regulation on the economy”, “the efficient administration of the Office” or “the integrity of the patent system. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 2:35 pm
"Faux-Dem" Mike B. is blanketing the airwaves in every Super Tuesday state. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 7:04 am
Question: Which candidates support Proposal A and which support Proposal B? [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 5:30 am
This is possible thanks to 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C). [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 5:45 am
In the majority opinion Chen made much of the civil procedure aspects of a 12(b)(6) motion, as well he should. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 11:00 pm
Kappos Patent Term Adjustment (PTA) case (1:12cv574) (Exelixis II) that affirms the USPTO’s interpretation of 35 USC § 154(b)(1)(B)(i). [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 4:15 am
§ 282(b), not a cognizable defense in a patent litigation? [read post]
