Search for: "ROBERTS v. STATE"
Results 3481 - 3500
of 16,790
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2020, 9:57 am
Chief Justice John Roberts. [read post]
29 Dec 2006, 3:26 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Robert J. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:32 am
” Lastly, about Ortiz v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 10:47 pm
Roberts. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 6:05 am
” (As Justice Roberts wrote in the 2007 school segregation case, Parents Involved in Community Schools v. [read post]
2 Dec 2006, 8:16 am
On Wednesday, November 29, the Court heard argument in Watters v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 1:21 pm
In Fortune v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 9:39 am
Callais and Landry v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 5:26 am
Coinbase, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 11:59 am
Dreeben’s first argument was in a case called United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 6:52 am
(Lyle summarized the state of play in those proceedings for this blog.) [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 7:24 pm
Robert Barnes of The Washington Post reports that “Supreme Court divided on whether states should tax all online sales. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 9:01 am
On July 9, 2007, Judge Robert S. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 3:35 am
Snow’ (listed as a joint account holder along with the Snows), a false Washington State ID number for Robert Snow, and the Snows' true bank account and routing numbers. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 3:58 pm
By Thomas Kaufman and Robert Mussig On June 25, 2012, in Coito v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 5:19 am
There's new state-level legislation banning abortion after the 20th week, premised on the notion of fetal pain and building on the legal precedent in Gonzales v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:32 am
At this blog, Marty Lederman discusses the impact of last week’s decision in United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2024, 3:18 am
The Supreme Court’s ruling in Trump v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 6:13 am
Gutierrez and Holder v. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 7:14 am
With commentary at the Lock Law Blog, Ryan Lockman argues that “there is a minimal chance that [the state] will convince Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Kennedy and the three remaining conservatives to encroach on state sovereignty in such a fashion, particularly when the main authority on which their argument is based is Bush v. [read post]