Search for: "STATE v. GEORGE" Results 3481 - 3500 of 6,481
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2014, 11:24 am
 This Kat believes that Member States are free to legislate in relation to exceptions or limitations to the right of adaptation, but these must be intended narrowly, ie as limited to what can be considered as pure adaptations, not transformative uses of a work that nonetheless also involve its simple reproduction.For instance, while it is arguable that creating a play from a novel may fall exclusively within the scope of the right of adaptation, it may be more… [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Dubler is George Welwood Murray Professor of Legal History atColumbia Law School. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 5:47 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The patent in question is US 549,160 issued in 1895 to a Rochester lawyer named George B. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 1:18 am
George Denkowski was the state's psychological expert for determining mental retardation in each of these cases. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 12:24 am by Orin Kerr
A taste: As policies, Obamacare and George W. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 6:31 am by JB
This reading makes particular sense given the textual connections between The Preamble, Article I, section 18, Article II, Article III, section 2, Article V, Article VI, and Article VII.According to Article VII, until the Constitution is ratified by nine states, it does not come into effect. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 9:34 pm
As has been stated, the rewards shall also stand transferred along with the risk in a sale transaction. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 6:23 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
" Large Jury Award Vacated Because of Faulty Instruction on Bicyclist Duties In Mariano Simota Bailey v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:18 pm
Prelesnik, No. 072522 In conviction for second degree murder, grant of writ of habeas corpus for ineffective counsel is affirmed where: 1) potential alibi witnesses coupled with an otherwise weak case rendered the failure to investigate the testimony sufficient to "undermine confidence" in the outcome of the jury verdict; and 2) the state appellate court's application of Strickland v. [read post]