Search for: "State v. Character"
Results 3481 - 3500
of 7,506
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jul 2015, 8:27 pm
We have agreed that some symbols, cross burnings for example (Virginia v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 1:25 pm
But all public sidewalks near the courthouse are “traditional public fora” (see United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 8:24 am
Passing offFor the reasons stated in relation to whether Sofa Workshop’s CTMs had acquired distinctive character in the UK, Sofa Workshop had goodwill in its business there which was associated in the public mind with its trading name ‘Sofa Workshop’. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 1:03 pm
The first of these is GO Outdoors Ltd v Skechers USA Inc II [2015] EWHC 1405 (Ch), a 19 May decision of Mrs Justice Rose, sitting in the Chancery Division, England and Wales, on an appeal from a decision of the UK Intellectual Property Office. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 11:31 am
They also hark back to Baze v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:22 pm
" Everything was going along fine until Marvel stumbled across Brulotte v Thys (1964). [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 12:35 pm
In last week's opinion in Obergefell v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 11:07 am
§ 440.11] was unconstitutional [see State of Florida v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:28 am
Fictional memory, imaginary state of mind, imagined shopping experience—and then we complain that we don’t have ecologically valid evidence! [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:40 am
Thus, there is no lawful basis for a state to refuse to recognize a lawful same-sex marriage performed in another state on the ground of its same-sex character. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 5:05 am
SCOTUS surprised everyone by releasing Obergefell v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:17 am
These affect the correct classification of services as well as trade mark use: whose use is it and what is its effect, whether for the purposes of acquiring distinctive character, of establishing genuine use, or of infringement? [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 2:00 am
”Although Trooper offered explanations “for some of the many discrepancies” in his testimony, the Appellate Division said that “this created a credibility question which was resolved against him” and substantial evidence supports the administrative determination.As to the penalty imposed by the Superintendent, the court said “we have observed that ‘a State Trooper holds a position of great sensitivity and trust and a higher standard of fitness and… [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 8:34 pm
U.S. 438 (1972) and Griswold v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 5:16 pm
[T]he Court also must hold—and it now does hold—that there is no lawful basis for a State to refuse to recognize a lawful same-sex marriage performed in another State on the ground of its same-sex character. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 3:08 pm
The SCOTUS opinion, authored by Justice Kennedy, holds that “same-sex couples may exercise the fundamental right to marry in all States [and] that there is no lawful basis for a State to refuse to recognize a lawful same-sex marriage performed in another State on the ground of its same-sex character. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:28 pm
As the four dissenting opinions make abundantly clear, today’s ruling in Obergefell v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:42 pm
Following up my earlier posting on Justice Kennedy's majority opinion today in Obergefell v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 9:50 am
”) and In re S.C. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 9:30 am
A state cannot refuse to recognize a lawful same-sex marriage performed in another state on the ground of its same-sex character. [read post]
