Search for: "State v. Marks"
Results 3481 - 3500
of 19,483
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2013, 9:14 pm
United States, 319F.3d 1334, 1338 (Fed. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 8:02 am
In United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 1:06 pm
| Skykick - why does it matter & what could it mean for trade marks? [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 6:49 am
State v. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 3:17 am
John Edward Guzman d/b/a Club Ed Surf School and Camp v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 3:02 am
"Los Santos, LLC v. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 10:58 am
Accordingly, it does not matter if the mark depicts an apostrophe or a quotation mark. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 1:01 am
The issue has since come to more judicial prominence, and the Supreme Court of British Columbia endeavoured to answer the matter last month.Chasing mice or chasing careers; the grown-up world scared MerpelThe case of Vancouver Community College v Vancouver Career College 2015 BCSC 1470 concerned the use of the acronym "VCC"; one that Vancouver Community College had been using prominently for a number of years since the College's inception in the 1960s, as well as… [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 3:20 am
Quirk, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 11:03 pm
In true anecdotal style, the author explains the relevance of Section 115 of the Indian statute (appointment of scientific advisors) by pointing out the open expression of gratitude by Lord Hoffmann in Kirin-Amgen v. [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 7:44 pm
See Julius Samman Ltd. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 4:08 pm
On 12 December 2011 Mr Justice Tugendhat gave judgment on the assessment of damages in three actions by Matthew Cooper and Imaginatik plc (“the Company”) against Mark Turrell ([2011] EWHC 3269 (QB)). [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 3:30 am
In Ball v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 8:02 am
Lilly-v-Arla-Opinion [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 1:00 pm
Mark Lunney (King's College London, UK)9. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 11:38 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 11:41 am
Introduction With its decision in Adolph v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:53 pm
At the General Session Luncheon on June 27, 2014, during the State Bar of Texas’s Annual Meeting in Austin, 2013-2014 State Bar of Texas President Lisa M. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 1:28 pm
The 4-1 decision, written by State Supreme Court Justice Robert Rucker of Gary, backs a Marion County parent who left marks on her son's buttocks and arms in 2006 because those five lashes were "reasonable" and left no "permanent" mark. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 9:00 am
The Opposition Division dismissed the opposition based on Article 8(5) too, since Elmar Wolf had not adduced evidence of any detriment to the repute of the earlier marks or any unfair advantage gained from them.... and another one Elmar Wolf's appeal to the Second Board of Appeal was more successful: the Board found that the earlier marks were highly reputed in three Member States, that there was some similarity between the marks at issue and that the relevant… [read post]
