Search for: "X, Y "
Results 3481 - 3500
of 4,308
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2010, 3:30 am
Your supplement may ramble on for pages about the legislative history of a code section, or hammer home the difficult distinction between point x and point y, but if your professor didn't touch on that stuff in class- SKIP IT. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 6:43 pm
Next, [X]'s turn [to read it], then, [Y]'s. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 3:11 am
The Court concluded, unanimously, that the decision to take a blood test and photograph the second applicant against her parents’ express instructions gave rise to an interference with her right to respect for her private life and, in particular, her right to physical integrity (see X and Y v. the Netherlands, 26 March 1985, § 22, Series A no. 91; Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346/02, §§ 61 and 63, ECHR 2002-III; Y.F. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 11:34 am
Y, too. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 5:35 am
One may do X, and Y consequence will follow (i.e., one will get access to the bounteous benefits of health insurance and reduce one’s dependence on one’s fellow citizens); or one may choose options A, B, or C, and each of these choices, too, will come with a specific consequence that one can and will understand beforehand.Moffit argues that the best way to serve the policy goals of the individual mandate while preserving economic liberty is to structure the mandate as a… [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:46 pm
In many cases, the Appellant fails to address claim construction, and simply argues "Reference's X is not claimed Y", without considering that a broad interpretation of the claim element Y really does read on X in the reference. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 8:25 am
– by identifying people who go straight from (x) having always been current on their mortgages to (y) being (i) 180 days late, while (ii) staying current on all their other debt obligations, such as credit cards and auto loans. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 6:34 am
You might say for $5,000 a month, you’ll have me on call to do x, y, z tasks relating to negotiating leases or advising on bankruptcy restructuring. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 5:04 pm
Merida: Calle 60 no. 338-K x 29 y 31, Col. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 11:16 am
Read this fictional account as a work of non-fiction, and you'll have an understanding of Generations X and Y, and the Millennials. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 8:33 am
I’ve certainly often heard such arguments about other usage matters: It’s wrong to use word X to mean Y, because that will cause confusion or will eliminate a useful distinction or what have you. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 8:02 am
There is another fear that if the regulators are so sure that folks liberated from their biases would decide X instead of Y, but they keep choosing Y when nudged, eventually, the regulator figures he needs to shove harder and raise the cost of choosing Y until the individual finally chooses X. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 4:49 am
We can't have rules that say services x,y and z pass muster but a, b and c don't because new services are always emerging, and lawyers will constantly be looking for precise guidance. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 11:47 am
The mere fact that X exists to a degree now doesn't mean that expanding X categorically isn't a change in a plan. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:46 am
The insuror will pay $x, but the drug is for sale at $y, and the individual pays $(y-x). [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 11:00 pm
Our most recent in-depth human rights case comments: Removal of child following faulty diagnosis of injury breached Article 8 ((AD and OD v United Kingdom (Application No 28680/06)) Exceptionally serious circumstances must be established to resist extradition order says Supreme Court (Norris v United States ) EU Directive on Refugee status does not enhance asylum rights under Strasbourg Convention (The Queen on the Application of MK(Iran) v Secretary of State for the Home Department)… [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 3:51 am
Ten years ago, Generations X and Y were a growing minority of the jury pool. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 2:37 pm
” Myth: Lawsuits cost taxpayers X hundreds of dollars each year. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 1:11 pm
The court of appeals began with an example clearly demonstrating that non-infringing comparative advertising can still be false advertising: an ad stating that “In a blind taste test, 9 out of 10 New Yorkers said they preferred Brand X Coffee to Brand Y Coffee. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 5:10 am
If we got off track even the slightest bit, they were able to see it in real time and say, ‘hey, you mentioned that our primary goal is X and really our primary goal is Y’, and so, it resulted in almost no second-guessing. [read post]
