Search for: "D, Otherwise C. v. C"
Results 3501 - 3520
of 4,550
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 4:30 am
LEXIS 124261 (D. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 1:06 pm
Livingston, 5 N.J. 65 (1950), or where there is importunity which cannot be resisted and is yielded to for the sake of peace (Den d. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
-EU Mutual Legal Assistance Agreement, providing that the costs associated with establishing and servicing a video-conference for mutual legal assistance purposes, as well as the allowances and expenses related to travel of persons in relation to such video-conferences, will be borne by the Requesting State unless otherwise agreed. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:57 pm
However, the moment this presumption is erected, both the burden of proof (which otherwise would have been upon the contestant, Gellert v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:48 am
Considering Potential Variations in Arbitration Awards Susan D. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:48 am
Considering Potential Variations in Arbitration Awards Susan D. [read post]
31 May 2011, 9:00 am
Otherwise, that person may be discharged from custody, and the Requested State may refuse a subsequent extradition request from the Requesting State for that person for the same offense. [read post]
30 May 2011, 5:19 pm
The City’s "unilateral use of public hearings . . . in connection with [police] disciplinary proceedings [was] in excess of [the City’s] jurisdiction, illegal and contrary to law, in violation of lawful procedure and the [D]ue [P]rocess [C]lauses of the State and Federal Constitutions and [was] arbitrary, capricious and an abuse of discretion. [read post]
30 May 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V. [read post]
26 May 2011, 9:00 am
(d) Assaults on board a ship on the high seas with intent to do grievous bodily harm. 8. [read post]
24 May 2011, 6:33 pm
The public adjuster representing the insured may be present for the insurer’s inspection, but if the unavailability of the public adjuster otherwise delays the insurer’s timely inspection of the property, the public adjuster or the insured must allow the insurer to have access to the property without the participation or presence of the public adjuster or insured in order to facilitate the insurer’s prompt inspection of the loss or damage. [read post]
24 May 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:40 am
On 9 March 2011, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the joint appeal of Sienkiewicz v Grief (UK) Ltd; Knowsley MBC v Willmore [2011] UKSC 10. [read post]
23 May 2011, 12:41 pm
§§ 924(c) & (j), 1951. [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:00 pm
In addition, with regard to offenses committed outside the territory of the Requesting State, Article 2(5) provides that extradition shall be granted if the Requested State’s laws provide for punishment of an offense committed outside of its territory in similar circumstances, and if the requirements of extradition under the Treaty are otherwise met. [read post]
19 May 2011, 10:47 am
This was a long time in coming given that the 16 CFR 1512 standard was issued in 1978. [read post]
18 May 2011, 6:13 pm
Otherwise it is mandatory. [read post]
17 May 2011, 4:45 pm
” D) RAFRA contains the following provision: “Notwithstanding 28 U.S.C. [read post]
17 May 2011, 7:23 am
Davey Smith, D. [read post]
