Search for: "EQUAL RIGHTS ADVOCATES"
Results 3501 - 3520
of 7,219
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2017, 11:13 am
In your criminal case, you need an aggressive and knowledgeable advocate in your corner. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 11:13 am
In your criminal case, you need an aggressive and knowledgeable advocate in your corner. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 5:35 am
But that, according to advocates, is an unacceptable response as it stigmatizes them by treating them differently. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 4:31 am
Brings a tear to your eye, right? [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 7:09 pm
But it is not as robust as some advocates would like to believe. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 5:01 am
Conversely, Chevron deference is a popular concept with progressive employee and civil-rights advocates, as it allowed the Obama administration to expand employee protections in the face of a hostile Congress. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 4:00 am
Recently, the GOP-controlled House of Representatives passed legislation that, if enacted, would abolish Chevron deference.Conversely, Chevron deference is a popular concept with progressive employee and civil-rights advocates, as it allowed the Obama administration to expand employee protections in the face of a hostile Congress. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 12:48 pm
One year after the cotton gin, that number increased to 1.6 million pounds. n34 By the time Whitney died in 1825, cotton exports to England alone reached 171 million pounds. n35 In 1850, Thomas Macaulay noted, "What Peter the Great did to make Russia dominant, Eli Whitney's invention of the gin has more than equaled in its relation to the power and progress of the United States. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 6:34 am
Human Rights ► Ali Aghahosseini Dehaghani, Ph.D. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 4:36 pm
The question of privacy is not all or nothing, just as the right to free speech [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 10:07 am
Texas is a right-to-work state and unions are weak here. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 10:00 am
Even the most aggressive advocates of executive power have denounced the ban. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 11:15 pm
But the judges do emphasize that “[i]t is well established that evidence of purpose beyond the face of the challenged law may be considered in evaluating Establishment and Equal Protection Clause claims. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 12:15 pm
And it’s similarly illegal to keep people from applying for credit by denying them information under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 8:31 am
The Committee called on CEDAW state parties to inter alia ensure that implementation of their WPS commitments was taking place within the broader equality and women’s rights obligations of CEDAW. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 7:30 am
It has been our history for over 97 years to fight the worst assaults against justice, equality, and democracy. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 6:40 am
This is the principal question that the Dutch Supreme Court (Hoge Raad der Nederlanden) referred to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Stichting Brein, C-610/15.As readers will promptly recall, this is just the last in a(n impressive, quantity-wise) series of references for a preliminary ruling seeking clarification on the interpretation of the right of communication to the public within Article 3(1) of the InfoSoc Directive, the most immediate precedents… [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 5:10 am
This is the principal question that the Dutch Supreme Court (Hoge Raad der Nederlanden) referred to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Stichting Brein, C-610/15.As readers will promptly recall, this is just the last in a(n impressive, quantity-wise) series of references for a preliminary ruling seeking clarification on the interpretation of the right of communication to the public within Article 3(1) of the InfoSoc Directive, the most immediate precedents being GS Media… [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 6:07 am
Land is the basis of freedom, justice, and equality. [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 4:29 pm
In other words, the AG is pointing out that there is a fine line between (on the one hand) using provisions in data protection law to protect the legitimate interests of one group, and (on the other hand) using reliance upon data protection law in ways that could obstruct another group from achieving the enforcement of their (equally legitimate) legal rights under other areas of law. [read post]
