Search for: "Key v State"
Results 3501 - 3520
of 22,453
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2016, 5:11 am
Robins, a key case argued before the high court in November that has yet to be decided. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 6:10 pm
However, "[b]ecause Defendant PRC's wrongful acts alleged herein arise in connection with a commercial activity that causes a direct effect in the United Stated, Defendant PRC comes within an express exception to the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, viz, 28 U.S.C. section 1605 (a)(2):(a) A foreign state shall not be immune from the jurisdiction of courts of the United States or of the States in any case - (1) in which the foreign state has… [read post]
6 Jan 2019, 5:17 am
After my bird's-eye view of the first FTC v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:33 am
V. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 1:13 am
(The case is Balentine v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:02 pm
Supreme Court decisions in recent years: Ledbetter v. [read post]
19 Aug 2017, 4:04 pm
In State v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:13 pm
Fast forward to 2012, where the Missouri Supreme Court found otherwise in State v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:13 pm
Fast forward to 2012, where the Missouri Supreme Court found otherwise in State v. [read post]
27 Nov 2020, 2:56 am
See Navarro v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 5:13 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 8:00 am
This is Congress' response to United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 9:53 am
The Adkins v. [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 8:25 am
(PhoneDog v. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 5:50 pm
The state of Texas, one of the most energetic opponents of a key part of the federal Voting Rights Act, has turned what it was sure was a Supreme Court victory against that law into a legal defeat that will cost it more than $1 million. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 12:00 pm
Amendments to Chapter IV of 4 NYCRR (Regulations of the State Civil Service Commission [Commission’s Regulations]) A new §55.5 codified the long-standing Civil Service Commission practice of granting prior approval for certain examination rating keys, according to the conditions and standards set forth within such section, upon the request of the Civil Service Department’s Director of Examinations or his or her designee. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 6:58 pm
According to an analysis published in the Wall Street Journal the suits “could challenge the broad liability protection that medical device makers have enjoyed since a key Supreme Court ruling in 2008. [read post]
15 Oct 2016, 12:38 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 3:45 am
Finally, in State v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 2:15 pm
Breyer’s majority opinion makes three key holdings, affirming the vital role courts play in ensuring that states respect the fundamental constitutional principles of liberty, equality, and dignity. [read post]
