Search for: "Light v. United States" Results 3501 - 3520 of 11,300
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2014, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
On March 10, 2014, the Court invited the Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States in Bank of America, N.A. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 3:21 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 2-3, n. 1. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 5:35 pm by INFORRM
The fourth section of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) delivered a remarkable judgment in the case of L.B. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 5:14 pm
This case is on appeal from the district court's resentencing of Joseph Story in light of United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 8:08 am by Florian Mueller
Those three non-standard-essential patents, which have not previously been asserted against any party, are now at the heart of Ericsson's third ITC complaint against Apple.In light of this newly discovered document, I have to update my hierarchical directory of the seven Ericsson-Apple cases pending in the United States:FRAND actionsEricsson v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 5:00 pm
Introduction In Part IVA (here) we considered whether the question in Stolt-Nielsen was one for the court or the arbitrators to decide, and predicted that at least five Justices of the United States Supreme Court will hold that the court must decide it. [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 12:10 pm by Gustav L. Schmidt
  We previously blogged about this petition, which was submitted by a group of ten law professors in response to the Supreme Court’s opinion in the Citizens United v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 2:35 pm
Trew, No. 09-0414/NA, is "WHETHER, IN LIGHT OF UNITED STATES v. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 4:46 pm by Barbara E. Lichman, Ph.D., J.D.
  [See, e.g., 49 U.S.C. 40103(a)(1) re: “Sovereignty and the Right of Public Transit – (1) The United States Government has exclusive sovereignty of airspace of the United States. [read post]
15 May 2019, 11:04 am by Aurora Barnes
Reno and its progeny alleging that a city council racially gerrymandered new district boundaries when the central question is whether legislators drew boundaries with a predominant racial intent – governs the assertion of legislative privilege by state and local officials, especially in light of the tension between the Supreme Court’s decisions in United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 10:39 am by Jason Rantanen
The second, In re Boloro (Appeal nos. 2019-2349, -2351, -2353), Sept. 16, 2021, was an order by the Federal Circuit remanding the case to allow Bolero to request Director rehearing of the final written decisions in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 12:18 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
United States, 371 U.S. 156, 168 (1962), or tosupply a reasoned justification for an agency decision thatthe agency itself has not given, Motor Vehicle Mfrs. [read post]