Search for: "Line v. Line" Results 3501 - 3520 of 45,554
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2020, 12:05 pm by Jason Mazzone
" The essay carefully draws some important lines between federal courts and federal law on one hand and state courts and state law on the other and concludes: "One Bush v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
  Here is the abstract:On November 5, 2013, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Bond v. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 8:30 pm by Eugene Volokh
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. and Conestoga Wood Specialty Store v. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 5:23 am
Igbinedion, Human Rights as a Basis for Recovering the Proceeds of Grand Corruption Constantinos Yiallourides, Calming the Waters in the West African Region: The Case of Ghana and Côte d'Ivoire Esther Gumboh, Rep v. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 2:01 am by Jen Patja Howell
When the Supreme Court handed down its opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 1:00 am by Stuart Brooks, Olswang LLP
  On the other hand, the Court of Appeal sanctioned the High Court ruling in Samsung v Apple [2012] EWHC 1882 (Pat) that an important feature of Apple’s design (also being filed in black and white line drawings [shown at Fig 3]) was a lack of surface decoration, which became an important differentiator between it and the alleged infringement. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 4:55 am by Dan Farber
Now that I’ve had a chance to read the lengthy opinion in EMR Homer City Generation v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 6:43 am
Patently O - has an extensive commentary on the arguments presented by the parties and the amici in Microsoft v. [read post]
6 Jun 2020, 7:12 am by Eric Goldman
This sets up the possibility that courts outside the Ninth Circuit might reconsider that line of thinking. [read post]
14 Nov 2015, 9:35 am
This line of reasoning could be elicited from the witness to actually hurt the offering defendant’s case. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 1:08 pm by Tammy Binford
In 2015, the U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals set out a standard different from the 2010 DOL guidance in Glatt v. [read post]