Search for: "MATTER OF B T B" Results 3501 - 3520 of 20,110
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2012, 6:50 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Anyway, the chapters provide overviews of important procedural matters like prudential standing, pleading under Iqbal/Twombly, injunctions after eBay/Winter, etc., as well as the substantive elements of a Lanham Act false advertising claim and some discussion of instances when 43(a)(1)(B) won’t work (the TM/false advertising line, Dastar, FDA preemption, etc.). [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 11:08 am by mdkeenan
If you have questions about this or another related Illinois criminal or traffic matter, please contact Matt Keenan at 847-568-0160 or email matt@mattkeenanlaw.com. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 9:18 am by Sean Wajert
  While the motion here seemed to fit the purpose of the rule, it didn't fit the language. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 12:32 pm by South Florida Lawyers
Local Rule 26.1(g)(3)(B) requires that objections based upon privilege identify the specific nature of the privilege being asserted, as well as identifying details such as the nature and subject matter of the communication at issue, the sender and receiver of the communication and their relationship to each other. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 4:11 pm by Oliver G. Randl
T 320/87 and T 356/93 both have envisaged such an approach.The EBA undertakes to determine what the purpose of the exclusion in A 53(b) was when the EPC 1973 and the Preliminary Draft (SPC) Convention of the Council of Europe were drafted. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 2:16 pm by Justin Walsh
As to the fraudulent transfer: Based on RCW 19.40.041(b)’s 11 factors, the facts of the present matter strongly suggest fraud in the Wilsons’ property transfer: The Wilsons were married, Mr. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 10:07 pm
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THESUPREME COURT OF KENTUCKYBRIEF FOR PETITIONERS________DONALD B. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 1:41 am by tekEditor
(Van Nest, Robert) (Filed on 7/5/2012) (Entered: 07/05/2012) 07/05/2012 - 1217 - RESPONSE (re 1212 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law - ORACLE AMERICA, INC.'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW UNDER RULE 50(B) OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR A NEW TRIAL - ) (Google Inc.'s Opposition to Oracle America, Inc.'s Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law Under Rule 50(b) or, in the Alternative, for a New Trial) filed byGoogle Inc.. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 2:29 pm by Lee E. Berlik
Looking back at my original example (“according to Steve, Paul is a convicted felon”), let’s assume Steve doesn’t work for the government and his statement about Paul is not on a matter of public interest. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 1:25 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
”  This wasn’t a matter of “judicial notice,” as the dissent accused. [read post]