Search for: "MATTER OF D S N"
Results 3501 - 3520
of 5,779
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2014, 8:01 pm
[Bloggers Note: Today's guest column comes from noted Atlanta-based business immigration lawyer, Eileen M.G. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 5:01 pm
[Bloggers Note: Today's guest column comes from noted Atlanta-based business immigration lawyer, Eileen M.G. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 1:02 pm
For example, the Court in Matter of Kucharek, 79 B.R. 393, 397 (Bankr. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 2:00 pm
Id. at 2474 n.1.Plaintiffs desperate to escape preemption have tried nitpicking Bartlett to death. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 1:19 am
On 14 January 2014, the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom delivered its judgment In the matter of LC (Children) and In the matter of LC (Children) (No 2). [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 4:15 am
’s Br. in Opp’n to Mot. for Partial Summ. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 7:26 pm
The paper hinted that perhaps Germany could be next, noting, “[u]n effet domino qui pourrait être désastreux” (“A domino effect could be disastrous”). [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 11:47 am
Attorney)Source of Law: United StatesVerdict or Settlement Amount: N/ALegal Claims: Computer Fraud and Abuse ActFraudTheftOtherLegal Counsel: Douglas A Morris (Federal Public Defender - Dallas); Ahmed Ghappour (University of Texas Law School), Charles D. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 11:47 am
Attorney)Source of Law: United StatesVerdict or Settlement Amount: N/ALegal Claims: Computer Fraud and Abuse ActFraudTheftOtherLegal Counsel: Douglas A Morris (Federal Public Defender - Dallas); Ahmed Ghappour (University of Texas Law School), Charles D. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 11:47 am
Attorney)Source of Law: United StatesVerdict or Settlement Amount: N/ALegal Claims: Computer Fraud and Abuse ActFraudTheftOtherCourt Name: United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas: Dallas DivisionLegal Counsel: Douglas A Morris (Federal Public Defender - Dallas); Ahmed Ghappour (University of Texas Law School), Charles D. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 4:13 pm
But it seems to me that this assumes the conclusion, at least if the judge is suggesting that “Wandering Dagos” ought to be socially condemned (a separate matter, as the judge realizes, from whether it’s protected by the First Amendment). [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 4:58 am
Evergreen Ass’n, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 5:04 am
D. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 6:50 am
I figured I’d just put up a copy of his famous “I Have A Dream” speech and call it a day. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 10:08 am
Lakeview Reserve Homeowners Ass’n, Inc., 48 So.3d 902 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010), aff ’d 38 Fla. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 8:59 am
Doe 1, 542 F.Supp.2d 153, 174 (D. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 8:20 am
Supp. 2d 556, 575 n.15 (E.D. [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 9:03 pm
This was particularly difficult for the court, as it noted “[i]n this age of connectivity, this lack of contemporaneous documentation is unusual for such a serious matter. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
& Aaron D. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 7:02 am
Initially, the court rejected the defendant’s contention that the plaintiffs “made sales” as defined by the outside sales exemption, as a matter of law: The Plaintiffs’ evidence raises a genuine issue of material fact about whether they were “making sales,” and thus, qualified as outside salesman. [read post]
