Search for: "Marks v. State"
Results 3501 - 3520
of 19,797
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2024, 3:48 am
Paradise Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 9:00 am
The Opposition Division dismissed the opposition based on Article 8(5) too, since Elmar Wolf had not adduced evidence of any detriment to the repute of the earlier marks or any unfair advantage gained from them.... and another one Elmar Wolf's appeal to the Second Board of Appeal was more successful: the Board found that the earlier marks were highly reputed in three Member States, that there was some similarity between the marks at issue and that the relevant… [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 12:40 pm
Within the hour, oral arguments will kick off at the Supreme Court in Heller v. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 2:04 am
Mark Schweizer explores how this ties in with the UPC's proposed ceilings on recoverable costs. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 6:32 am
Hearthware, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 5:11 pm
One Wholesaler v. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 10:12 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 8:50 pm
Lynch v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 3:55 am
LLC v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 7:41 pm
Swank and CFO Mark Fordyce. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:00 pm
Romania, no. 42250/02, 1 July 2008 and Frodl v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 12:20 am
While noting that it is for the referring court to make a determination in the specific case at hand, the AG stated that to this end "the referring court should carry out an overall assessment, taking into account the graphic representation and any descriptions filed at the time of application for registration, as well as other material relevant to identifying the essential characteristics of the contested mark, where applicable. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 3:58 am
Examples of such misfortune include the ‘Aspirin’ for acetylsalicylic acid in the United States (Bayer Co. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2024, 9:00 pm
States have broad leeway to determine how and when ballots, marked by Election Day, are returned (and there is significant variation in state practices). [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 7:30 am
In Harris v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 5:47 am
Pamela Karlan discusses the case at the Boston Review, and Mark Tushnet does the same at ACSblog. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 4:16 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2008, 11:11 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 4:32 am
The State of Hawaii has filed its Brief in Opposition in UFO Chuting of Hawaii, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 1:28 pm
The 4-1 decision, written by State Supreme Court Justice Robert Rucker of Gary, backs a Marion County parent who left marks on her son's buttocks and arms in 2006 because those five lashes were "reasonable" and left no "permanent" mark. [read post]