Search for: "State v. Register"
Results 3501 - 3520
of 13,695
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2008, 11:21 am
9-13-2008 Massachusetts:BOSTON - Citing a possible gap in state law, a state Appeals Court judge on Friday threw out the conviction of a homeless sex offender in Greenfield for failing to notify authorities that he moved to a new residence.Claude Bolling, a "Level 3" sex offender - meaning he is considered by the state to be at high risk of re-offending - registered his permanent address as "the streets of Greenfield" to comply with the… [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 11:14 am
Dial-A-Mattress appealed the refusal to the United States Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, which affirmed the examiner's refusal to register the mark. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 2:46 pm
Topics covered will include: Bates v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 9:42 am
In Shah v Federbush, 2019 WL 5060496 ( S.D. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 12:00 am
But, he stated, the criminal offence of conspiracy is a continuing offence. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 12:10 pm
CTB, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 7:48 am
See Magic Wand Inc. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 12:52 am
It must be for the applicant to state clearly the type of monopoly for which he contends. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 6:47 am
” In our case, the Board cited Satava v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 3:10 am
Now the bank had registered the mortgage. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 3:10 am
Now the bank had registered the mortgage. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 8:26 am
Entm’t 200, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 3:09 am
Cai v. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 11:31 am
*By Devin Lucas and Shafik Bhalloo In Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP v. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 11:16 am
He stated that the High Court judge had erred in determining that targeting “imports a notion of taking deliberate aim at a country. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 3:07 am
In Janus v. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 11:19 am
The Ninth Circuit held last month, in Hawai‘i Wildlife Fund v. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 11:19 am
The Ninth Circuit held last month, in Hawai‘i Wildlife Fund v. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 2:15 am
The examiner (re)evaluated the claims and (again) stated the work could not be registered without limiting the application to the copyrightable part of the claim. [read post]
16 May 2014, 7:55 pm
(People v. [read post]
