Search for: "Three S Consulting v. US" Results 3501 - 3520 of 5,345
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2014, 12:15 pm
  In this case, the defendant sought to strike three categories of information:  1) Senate committee reports regarding an investigation of the defendant’s relationships with some of its consultants; 2) a set of articles disparaging defendant’s clinical trials; and 3) references to other lawsuits and settlements. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 4:00 am by Paula Bremner
Of course, as is evident from the decision of the US Supreme Court in FTC v Actavis [3], many would agree that “effective competition” is desirable. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 7:08 am by Stephen M. Ozcomert
Call us today at (404)-370-1000 to schedule your free initial consultation, or you can reach us through our website. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 6:15 am by Andrew S. Wiliams, Esq.
  The Supreme Court’s 2013 decisions in Heimeshoff v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 4:37 pm
For a long time I’ve been meaning to write a post about the ongoing saga of the Seventh Circuit appeal in Motorola Mobility v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am by Abbott & Kindermann
In 2009, the county sheriff’s association approached the Association about hosting a three day rodeo as a fundraiser. [read post]
5 Jul 2014, 10:26 am by Evan M. Levow
To schedule a free and confidential consultation to discuss your case, please contact us online or at (877) 593-1717. [read post]