Search for: "United States v. Choice" Results 3501 - 3520 of 6,476
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  In this circumstance, it is not surprising that leading Democratic politicians, progressive legal scholars, and centrist or center-left groups like Common Cause have portrayed a new convention called under Article V of the 1787 Constitution as an anathema that would destroy what is left of the federal system sustaining the United States. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 4:20 pm by Marty Lederman
Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc. (1968), and United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 6:47 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Moreover, since June 11, 2009, when the United States made the transition to digital television, anyone using a digital converter box also has access to a V-chip. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 5:44 am by Marci A. Hamilton
Massachusetts, which held that states have the power to make vaccination compulsory in the public interest and the 1944 decision in Prince v. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 4:22 am
Brunetti.Here's what Thomas writes:Erik BrunettiFreedom of Expression Transcends Morality in US Trademark Registration by Thomas Key As the Court of Justice of the European Union is currently considering the role of freedom of expression in trademark law, the Supreme Court of the United States has made a sharp determination on the matter in Iancu v. [read post]
14 Aug 2024, 5:39 am by Michael C. Dorf
Much of the ruling and the focus of the various separate opinions in the Supreme Court's ruling last month in Moody v. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 8:07 am by Vera Eidelman
Others, including the ACLU, expressed concern that a few of these companies — namely Facebook, Google, and Twitter — wield such enormous power over online speech that, if they used it against people with fewer outlets than the president of the United States, the companies could effectively silence them. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 4:05 am by SHG
—A President, former President, Vice President, or former Vice President shall not be entitled to any form of immunity (whether absolute, presumptive, or otherwise) from criminal prosecution for alleged violations of the criminal laws of the United States unless specified by Congress. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 3:41 am by Brandon Bartels
State supreme court elections perform as well or better than elections to other major offices in the United States. 3. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 9:03 am by Jonathan H. Adler
We reject that result because the United States Constitution cannot properly be so interpreted. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
Also in June last year, the United Nations Human Rights Council unanimously approved a parallel project “[r]equest[ing] the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights to continue the work on domestic law remedies to address corporate involvement in gross human rights abuses, and to organize consultations with experts, States and other relevant stakeholders”. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 10:47 am by Jim Lindgren
Railroad Commission—another unconstitutional conditions case—the Court declared: "It is inconceivable that guaranties embedded in the Constitution of the United States may thus be manipulated out of existence. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 10:32 am by Amy Howe
United States (Oct. 2) – How should courts interpret the federal sentencing law that allows a defendant convicted of some nonviolent drug crimes to avoid what would otherwise be a mandatory minimum sentence? [read post]