Search for: "United States v. Holder"
Results 3501 - 3520
of 4,280
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2016, 1:24 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2012, 5:13 am
” California: On May 14, 2012, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California issued a lengthy decision (Vance’s Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 8:45 pm
(Spicy IP) Ireland New guidelines for dealing with extensions in time (Class 46) Malta International: Malta announces tax exemption for patent royalties (IP finance) Poland Time of bad faith in trade mark application (Class 46) South Africa World Cup 2010: Fake shirts pour in (Afro-IP) Spain Court elaborates on ‘trade mark families’ (Class 46) United Kingdom Unilever threatens legal action against BNP to prevent Marmite appearing in… [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 12:17 pm
The company just updated its terms of service and the following clause is the first thing you see - in bold: Terms of Service IF YOU RESIDE IN THE UNITED STATES, PLEASE NOTE: SECTION 34 OF THESE TERMS OF SERVICE CONTAINS AN ARBITRATION CLAUSE AND CLASS ACTION WAIVER. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 9:43 pm
Second, linking the applicability of Arts. 5(1) and 15 to the formal qualification of the investor as security holder might easily create a differential treatment of investors that are regarded as mere beneficial owners in countries such as the United Kingdom, where security holding is mainly based on trusts. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 11:28 am
On April 15, the Apple & contract manufacturers v. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 12:56 pm
"In-Car CD Copying DevicesThe lower court, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia addressed three issues on a motion for summary judgement:Whether "digital audio copied recordings" are "digital musical recordings. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 1:42 am
The most valuable one of Apple's three software patents-in-suit in the first case (most of the damages there relate to design patents, not software patents), the '915 pinch-to-zoom API patent, has meanwhile been rejected by the United States Patent and Trademark Office and Apple had to file an appeal to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. [read post]
12 Jan 2013, 1:43 am
Apple is fighting a strategic battle at the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision in Biden v. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm
By virtue of a 2003 ruling of the state’s highest court, in Goodridge v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 7:24 am
Village at Lakeridge, 15-1509, involves questions so important for the Republic, so pressing for our body politic, that the Supreme Court of the United States called for, and now has received, the views of the solicitor general. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 4:25 am
When parties have gone outside the boundaries that the state has set, it makes sense that the state would treat the impermissible act as if it never occurred. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 9:57 am
The CopyKat suspects she will, but to an extent it's virgin territory in the United Kingdom. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 8:42 am
AU New Haven, LLC v. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:45 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 12:39 pm
In my previous post I published the dissenting views of Commissioner Pinkert, one of the six chiefs of the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC), from the majority decision granting Samsung (unless vetoed by the United States Trade Representative or reversed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit) an exclusion order against older iPhones and iPads. [read post]
3 May 2013, 1:58 am
If so, is this state of affairs desirable or does it require correction? [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
” In the United States applicants may use a terminal disclaimers to “obviate judicially created double patenting” by disclaiming any a portion of the term of a patent and confirming that the patent will be commonly owned with the second patent – see MPEP s1490. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 11:05 am
Some years later, in 1999, a similar set of procedures was adopted by the United States Attorney’s Office in the Northern District of California in a manual drafted by one of the authors of the EDNY memo who had moved there and served as head of the Criminal Division. [read post]
